Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: NHK: Thyroid cancer found in 18 Fukushima children [View all]wtmusic
(39,166 posts)46. No, they didn't win a 1985 Nobel Prize for their work.
The organization International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War won the award. What is IPPNW's position on nuclear power? They don't have one:
IPPNW affiliates are national medical organizations with a common commitment to the abolition of nuclear weapons and the prevention of war. Affiliates range in size from a handful of dedicated physicians and medical students to tens of thousands of activists and their supporters. As independent organizations within a global federation, IPPNW affiliates engage in a wide variety of activities related to war, health, social justice, and the environment.
In much the same way Steven Starr "borrows" the credibility of a physician by touting his membership in Physicians for Social Responsibility, that group "borrows" the prestigious Nobel seal for their website - awarded to a different group for reasons that had nothing to do with nuclear power. This is a common tactic of antinuclear activists: without legitimate credentials and research of their own, they glom onto the legit credentials of other groups. In the process, they confuse well-meaning individuals like yourself not only about their work, but about real prospects for nuclear energy to fight global warming.
The Nobel Peace Prize for 1985
The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize for 1985 to the organisation International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War.
It is the committee's opinion that this organisation has performed a considerable service to mankind by spreading authoritative information and by creating an awareness of the catastrophic consequences of atomic warfare. The committee believes that this in turn contributes to an increase in the pressure of public opposition to the proliferation of atomic weapons and to a redefining of priorities, with greater attention being paid to health and other humanitarian issues. Such an awakening of public opinion, as is now apparent both in the East and in the West, in the North and in the South, can give the present arms limitation negotiations new perspectives and a new seriousness.
In this connection the committee attaches particular importance to the fact that the organisation was formed as a result of a joint initiative by Soviet and American physicians and that it now draws support from physicians in over forty countries all over the world.
It is the committee's intention to invite the organisation's two founders, who now share the title of president Professor Bernard Lown from the USA and Professor Yevgeny Chazov from the Soviet Union to receive the Peace Prize on behalf of their organisation.
Oslo, October 5, 1985
The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided to award the Nobel Peace Prize for 1985 to the organisation International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War.
It is the committee's opinion that this organisation has performed a considerable service to mankind by spreading authoritative information and by creating an awareness of the catastrophic consequences of atomic warfare. The committee believes that this in turn contributes to an increase in the pressure of public opposition to the proliferation of atomic weapons and to a redefining of priorities, with greater attention being paid to health and other humanitarian issues. Such an awakening of public opinion, as is now apparent both in the East and in the West, in the North and in the South, can give the present arms limitation negotiations new perspectives and a new seriousness.
In this connection the committee attaches particular importance to the fact that the organisation was formed as a result of a joint initiative by Soviet and American physicians and that it now draws support from physicians in over forty countries all over the world.
It is the committee's intention to invite the organisation's two founders, who now share the title of president Professor Bernard Lown from the USA and Professor Yevgeny Chazov from the Soviet Union to receive the Peace Prize on behalf of their organisation.
Oslo, October 5, 1985
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1985/press.html
Every reputable scientist, every real expert - people with advanced degrees in climatology like James Hansen - has said that nuclear power has to be a significant part of the solution to climate change. This conflating of nuclear war with nuclear energy is disingenuous, and without a credible alternative to nuclear energy PSR largely discounts their claim to be fighting global warming.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The panel says it cannot determine? FUCK it, of course these are related.
CaliforniaPeggy
Aug 2013
#2
The fact that this result, which demonstrates that there's been no impact...
phantom power
Aug 2013
#10
Top UK Climate Scientist says Coal with CCS is the ONLY solution to global warming
kristopher
Aug 2013
#52
I said nothing about nasty or mean. There is more to come, tell me that in five, ten years. nt
Mnemosyne
Aug 2013
#28
I see one of our resident nuke worshippers is already here mocking the very idea that
kestrel91316
Aug 2013
#13