Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: NHK: Thyroid cancer found in 18 Fukushima children [View all]kristopher
(29,798 posts)52. Top UK Climate Scientist says Coal with CCS is the ONLY solution to global warming
If you want to learn about climate science, look to climate scientists, I always say. But if you want to learn about climate policy and energy technology, well, you might try looking elsewhere. - J. Romm
Climatologist Myles Allen Says Were Doomed If We Keep Burning Carbon, Then Embraces Dubious Silver Bullet
BY JOE ROMM ON MAY 29, 2013 AT 7:33 PM
Why carbon capture and storage isnt the solution to our climate problems
If you want to learn about climate science, look to climate scientists, I always say. But if you want to learn about climate policy and energy technology, well, you might try looking elsewhere.
A case in point is British climate scientist, Myles Allen. He noted in the Daily Mail On Sunday (MoS) that were doomed to disastrous warming if we keep burning carbon even if a recent paper he coauthored about a low climate sensitivity turns out to be true. But then he went on to argue that the only solution and he does mean only solution is to mandate that companies capture and store the carbon they release.

Actual caption in MoS: Futile: Subsidising windfarms, like Whitelee on the outskirts of Glasgow, is a pointless policy, argues Professor Allen.
Allens policy discussion is precisely the kind of nonsense youd expect in the Mail, whose climate coverage is so atavastic, it makes the Wall Street Journal editorial page look like Climate Central. It is simply head-exploding that any serious climate scientist would publish a piece in publication discredited by so many climate scientists.
Back in 2010, two top climate scientists and the National Snow and Ice Data Center accused the Daily Mail of misquoting and misrepresenting them or their work. Last year, the UKs Met Office, part of its Defence Ministry, took the unusual step of releasing a statement utterly debunking David Roses assertions in the paper as entirely misleading and pointing out that they spoke to Rose before the piece came out but he chose to ignore what they had to say.
And so were subjected to this cranium-destroying headline and sub-head:
Ahh, those green fanatics. How much wiser our climate policy would be if not for their obsession with clean energy policy!! Seriously....
BY JOE ROMM ON MAY 29, 2013 AT 7:33 PM
Why carbon capture and storage isnt the solution to our climate problems
If you want to learn about climate science, look to climate scientists, I always say. But if you want to learn about climate policy and energy technology, well, you might try looking elsewhere.
A case in point is British climate scientist, Myles Allen. He noted in the Daily Mail On Sunday (MoS) that were doomed to disastrous warming if we keep burning carbon even if a recent paper he coauthored about a low climate sensitivity turns out to be true. But then he went on to argue that the only solution and he does mean only solution is to mandate that companies capture and store the carbon they release.

Actual caption in MoS: Futile: Subsidising windfarms, like Whitelee on the outskirts of Glasgow, is a pointless policy, argues Professor Allen.
Allens policy discussion is precisely the kind of nonsense youd expect in the Mail, whose climate coverage is so atavastic, it makes the Wall Street Journal editorial page look like Climate Central. It is simply head-exploding that any serious climate scientist would publish a piece in publication discredited by so many climate scientists.
Back in 2010, two top climate scientists and the National Snow and Ice Data Center accused the Daily Mail of misquoting and misrepresenting them or their work. Last year, the UKs Met Office, part of its Defence Ministry, took the unusual step of releasing a statement utterly debunking David Roses assertions in the paper as entirely misleading and pointing out that they spoke to Rose before the piece came out but he chose to ignore what they had to say.
And so were subjected to this cranium-destroying headline and sub-head:
Why I think were wasting billions on global warming, by top British climate scientist
The MoS has campaigned tirelessly against the folly of Britains eco-obsessed energy policy. Now comes a game-changing intervention . from an expert respected by the green fanatics themselves
Ahh, those green fanatics. How much wiser our climate policy would be if not for their obsession with clean energy policy!! Seriously....
More at http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/05/29/2066701/climatologist-myles-allen-says-were-doomed-if-we-keep-burning-carbon-then-embraces-dubious-silver-bullet/
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The panel says it cannot determine? FUCK it, of course these are related.
CaliforniaPeggy
Aug 2013
#2
The fact that this result, which demonstrates that there's been no impact...
phantom power
Aug 2013
#10
Top UK Climate Scientist says Coal with CCS is the ONLY solution to global warming
kristopher
Aug 2013
#52
I said nothing about nasty or mean. There is more to come, tell me that in five, ten years. nt
Mnemosyne
Aug 2013
#28
I see one of our resident nuke worshippers is already here mocking the very idea that
kestrel91316
Aug 2013
#13