Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PamW

(1,825 posts)
11. Nuclear plants were designed for more than 40 years.
Thu Feb 2, 2012, 10:36 AM
Feb 2012

Especially as the plants get older and their operating licenses are extended well past the limits of safe operation.
=========================

Nuclear power plants were designed for more than 40 years of operation.

They were licensed for 40 years; but that's not the design lifetime.

My driver's license is only good for 12 years; but does that mean that after my drivers license expires
on my birthday this year that I'm no longer competent to drive?

How come the anti-nukes never learn the difference between the length of term of the license and
the design lifetimes. We have so many instances of shorter license times, as per my driver's license
analog.

I guess they throw whatever BS comes to mind, without regard to good scholarship in determining whether
what they say is true or not.

Nuclear power plants are like jet airliners; they are maintained and parts are replaced on a regular basis.
About the only thing that isn't replaced is the reactor vessel, but that doesn't "wear out".
( Even neutron-induced embrittlement is a much longer timescale than the useful life of the plant. )

PamW

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Black Swan Theory and ant...»Reply #11