Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

In reply to the discussion: David Suzuki [View all]

PamW

(1,825 posts)
9. Pointing out scientific ERRORS is not professional assassination
Fri Oct 18, 2013, 06:32 PM
Oct 2013

kristopher,

The problem with Suzuki is that he puts his political views ahead of his scientific views.

When Suzuki's politics disagree with the science; then, in his mind, the politics wins.

If you want to be a good scientist in my book, and the books of other good scientists; you have to put science and truth ahead of politics.

For example, good scientists know that coal puts out more radioactivity into the environment than does nuclear.

http://web.ornl.gov/info/ornlreview/rev26-34/text/colmain.html

Now that may not sit well with a scientist who has anti-nuclear views; but it is the truth.

A scientist can not lie and tell a scientific falsehood just because it fits better with his politics if he wants to claim to be a good scientist.

You have to make you political opinions conform to the scientific truth; and not the other way around.

That's one area where Suzuki fails.

PamW

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

David Suzuki [View all] handmade34 Oct 2013 OP
Dr. David Suzuki ... polly7 Oct 2013 #1
big crushes handmade34 Oct 2013 #2
Absolutely ... both brilliant. polly7 Oct 2013 #3
As a scientist,... PamW Oct 2013 #6
these two men handmade34 Oct 2013 #7
But he dislikes nuclear so he must be a bad scientist. kristopher Oct 2013 #8
Pointing out scientific ERRORS is not professional assassination PamW Oct 2013 #9
What about when the nuclear plant isn't operating properly? kristopher Oct 2013 #10
Even then... PamW Oct 2013 #11
First things first... kristopher Oct 2013 #12
WRONG!! PamW Oct 2013 #14
Do I REALLY need to share your history here again? kristopher Oct 2013 #15
WRONG!! PamW Oct 2013 #17
I would like to know.... PamW Oct 2013 #13
How about this: kristopher Oct 2013 #16
Scientifically WRONG!!!` PamW Oct 2013 #18
Are you now so far gone you are saying MIT's Nuclear Dept is ... kristopher Oct 2013 #19
We don't have any "Integral Fast Reactors",... Kolesar Oct 2013 #20
We HAD one!! PamW Oct 2013 #21
When you give just a name in your headline ... eppur_se_muova Oct 2013 #4
point taken handmade34 Oct 2013 #5
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»David Suzuki»Reply #9