Environment & Energy

kristopher

(29,798 posts)

12. First things first...

Sat Oct 19, 2013, 02:22 PM

Oct 2013

You aren't a scientist. You may be a techie, but you have no regard for the pursuit of truth which underpins the philosophy of science; therefore you are no scientist.

Second, your denials regarding the consequences of Chernobyl and Fukushima, as well as your remarks on the future safety of the nuclear fleet are absurd on their face. They don't even require a specific refutation.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

David Suzuki [View all] handmade34 Oct 2013 OP

Dr. David Suzuki ... polly7 Oct 2013 #1

big crushes handmade34 Oct 2013 #2

Absolutely ... both brilliant. polly7 Oct 2013 #3

As a scientist,... PamW Oct 2013 #6

these two men handmade34 Oct 2013 #7

But he dislikes nuclear so he must be a bad scientist. kristopher Oct 2013 #8

Pointing out scientific ERRORS is not professional assassination PamW Oct 2013 #9

What about when the nuclear plant isn't operating properly? kristopher Oct 2013 #10

Even then... PamW Oct 2013 #11

First things first... kristopher Oct 2013 #12

WRONG!! PamW Oct 2013 #14

Do I REALLY need to share your history here again? kristopher Oct 2013 #15

WRONG!! PamW Oct 2013 #17

I would like to know.... PamW Oct 2013 #13

How about this: kristopher Oct 2013 #16

Scientifically WRONG!!!` PamW Oct 2013 #18

Are you now so far gone you are saying MIT's Nuclear Dept is ... kristopher Oct 2013 #19

We don't have any "Integral Fast Reactors",... Kolesar Oct 2013 #20

We HAD one!! PamW Oct 2013 #21

When you give just a name in your headline ... eppur_se_muova Oct 2013 #4

point taken handmade34 Oct 2013 #5