Environment & Energy

PamW

(1,825 posts)

17. WRONG!!

Sat Oct 19, 2013, 03:06 PM

Oct 2013

kristopher,

The litany of claims are false to YOU; the non-scientist.

However, EVERY single claim that I've made that you called "scientific nonsense" or "false"; is actually TRUE.

The problem is totally that you won't admit when you are WRONG!

I've demonstrated that you were in ERROR with claims of heat engines of 100% efficiency and no waste heat; and I've given links to the websites of University Physics Departments to validate my claims.

The whole problem is YOUR FAULTY understanding of science. Science isn't what YOU think it is; it is actually what I think it is.

Bring on your litany of FALSE "false claims"; and any scientists here can have a good laugh at them.

The good thing about science is that it is true, whether or not you believe in it.
--Neil deGrasse Tyson

No truer words were spoken by Neil deGrasse Tyson when it comes to the false claims of kristopher.

PamW

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

David Suzuki [View all] handmade34 Oct 2013 OP

Dr. David Suzuki ... polly7 Oct 2013 #1

big crushes handmade34 Oct 2013 #2

Absolutely ... both brilliant. polly7 Oct 2013 #3

As a scientist,... PamW Oct 2013 #6

these two men handmade34 Oct 2013 #7

But he dislikes nuclear so he must be a bad scientist. kristopher Oct 2013 #8

Pointing out scientific ERRORS is not professional assassination PamW Oct 2013 #9

What about when the nuclear plant isn't operating properly? kristopher Oct 2013 #10

Even then... PamW Oct 2013 #11

First things first... kristopher Oct 2013 #12

WRONG!! PamW Oct 2013 #14

Do I REALLY need to share your history here again? kristopher Oct 2013 #15

WRONG!! PamW Oct 2013 #17

I would like to know.... PamW Oct 2013 #13

How about this: kristopher Oct 2013 #16

Scientifically WRONG!!!` PamW Oct 2013 #18

Are you now so far gone you are saying MIT's Nuclear Dept is ... kristopher Oct 2013 #19

We don't have any "Integral Fast Reactors",... Kolesar Oct 2013 #20

We HAD one!! PamW Oct 2013 #21

When you give just a name in your headline ... eppur_se_muova Oct 2013 #4

point taken handmade34 Oct 2013 #5