Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Japan on gas, coal power building spree to fill nuclear void [View all]PamW
(1,825 posts)madokie states
I say you are less than truthful when you say you are a scientist. Pretty intelligent person I can accept but a true scientist, no, I can't. I base this on the many mistakes I've seen in your screeds both factual and typographical.
If you think I've made a factual or scientific error - by all means; tell me what error you think I've made.
I would be more than happy to explain the facts or scientific principles that you believe are in error.
Many scientific principles are quite counter-intuitive. Each year one of the scientific societies gives a test to non-scientists as to what they think is the correct scientific answer. In many cases, the results have the majority of non-scientists not only giving the incorrect answer; but they are very sure that their answer is correct.
Evidently, you take my insistence on good science as being too strident; and would prefer a tone that invites discussion. The problem comes when one has a law of science that is crystal clear as to what it says. If someone says, "Let's discuss whether or not the efficiency of a heat engine can exceed the Carnot efficiency"; that isn't something that can be debated. The Carnot limit on efficiency has been known for over a century; and there is over a century of good science that validates it. There really can't be any discussion on that. It's like asking to debate whether Congress has the power to levy taxes. It's really a settled issue.
I donate plenty to various causes; and will take your suggestion under advisement.
The good thing about science is that it is true, whether or not you believe in it.
--Neil deGrasse Tyson
PamW