Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

In reply to the discussion: David Suzuki [View all]

PamW

(1,825 posts)
21. We HAD one!!
Mon Oct 21, 2013, 04:35 PM
Oct 2013

Kolesar,

The USA HAD a working Integral Fast Reactor (IFR) prototype at Argonne-West on the site of the Idaho National Laboratory.

We don't need 30 years or 30 billion to develop it; Argonne already did it during the 1980s and early 1990s. See:

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/reaction/interviews/till.html

Q: And you in fact ran an experiment that was comparable to what happened at Chernobyl?

A: Yes, yes. Let me go on a little bit about that, because it is a rather dramatic characteristic. The Chernobyl accident happened in April 26 of 1986. Earlier that month, the first week in April, with our test reactor in Idaho, in fact the same reactor control room where we're now sitting, we performed a demonstration of that characteristic, where if you cut off the coolant from the reactor, what would happen? And there are two ways to cut off the coolant. One is that simply the pumps that are pumping the reactor stop. The reactor just shut itself down.

The IFR was an operating reactor at Idaho National Laboratory, that Argonne was running actual tests on; as per Dr. Till's description above.

The good thing about science is that it is true, whether or not you believe in it.
--Neil deGrasse Tyson

PamW

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

David Suzuki [View all] handmade34 Oct 2013 OP
Dr. David Suzuki ... polly7 Oct 2013 #1
big crushes handmade34 Oct 2013 #2
Absolutely ... both brilliant. polly7 Oct 2013 #3
As a scientist,... PamW Oct 2013 #6
these two men handmade34 Oct 2013 #7
But he dislikes nuclear so he must be a bad scientist. kristopher Oct 2013 #8
Pointing out scientific ERRORS is not professional assassination PamW Oct 2013 #9
What about when the nuclear plant isn't operating properly? kristopher Oct 2013 #10
Even then... PamW Oct 2013 #11
First things first... kristopher Oct 2013 #12
WRONG!! PamW Oct 2013 #14
Do I REALLY need to share your history here again? kristopher Oct 2013 #15
WRONG!! PamW Oct 2013 #17
I would like to know.... PamW Oct 2013 #13
How about this: kristopher Oct 2013 #16
Scientifically WRONG!!!` PamW Oct 2013 #18
Are you now so far gone you are saying MIT's Nuclear Dept is ... kristopher Oct 2013 #19
We don't have any "Integral Fast Reactors",... Kolesar Oct 2013 #20
We HAD one!! PamW Oct 2013 #21
When you give just a name in your headline ... eppur_se_muova Oct 2013 #4
point taken handmade34 Oct 2013 #5
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»David Suzuki»Reply #21