Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

wundermaus

(1,673 posts)
23. So many assumptions... I am sad for you.
Tue Oct 22, 2013, 11:28 PM
Oct 2013

You think you know it all.
You think you are a scientist, too?
Maybe you are.
Maybe you are not.
I could care less.
I'm no scientist... but if I were, I would know that there is more that I don't know than what I do know.
If I were a scientist I would be humbled, and in a state of awe and wonder:
To think I know something when we could just as well know nothing at all.
Seems strange to be lectured to like a child that I know nothing of science, of physics, of technology.
It amuses me that so many assumptions are made and so little is truly known.
We don't need to make electricity by splitting atoms... or fusing them together.
We have everything we need already.
The sun is our ultimate source of energy in this solar system.
Everything you and I are and ever will be is a result of that star shining on this planet.
Nature is generous to those who work with her.
And she is unforgiving of those who seek to rape her.
We waste so much, surely I would have expected you to lecture me on energy efficiency and conservation.
Atomic energy seems like an ideal solution to our gluttonous appetite for energy but to me, it is as deadly and disruptive of life as anything imaginable.
I hope you reliance on science is based on more than just your mind.
I hope it is based on the love of life.
If you assume your facts of science are valid why waste your time trying to convince me?
I am not convinced you are even in the ball park.
So build your nuclear power plants.
Just remember - 3 Mile Island and Chernobyl and Fukushima are scientific fact,too.
I pray we are not around to witness the ensuing folly of such a path with so many warning signs along the way.
"Nuclear Energy - What could go wrong?" - me

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Wonderful. Cleita Oct 2013 #1
Some governments see things in perspective.. PamW Oct 2013 #2
Find another way to boil water. wundermaus Oct 2013 #3
I'll let a scientist tell you what the problem is... PamW Oct 2013 #4
And I'll Let Max Planck rebut: Demeter Oct 2013 #5
You mean we have to let a generation of environmentalists die out? PamW Oct 2013 #6
NO, I mean we have to let a generation of nuclear sell-outs die off Demeter Oct 2013 #7
Sweetheart deal on price controls FogerRox Oct 2013 #8
£92.50 is the level they've set muriel_volestrangler Oct 2013 #11
The prediction for gas when the plant comes online is £74 FBaggins Oct 2013 #18
That's a sweetheart deal? FBaggins Oct 2013 #19
It's a lot less than offshore wind is getting Yo_Mama Oct 2013 #22
Then the analogy doesn't hold.... PamW Oct 2013 #9
No scientist would pervert a study like you have here. kristopher Oct 2013 #10
WRONG! PamW Oct 2013 #12
The credentials required are English language comprehension caraher Oct 2013 #14
WRONG too!! PamW Oct 2013 #15
Specifically which laws of physics are being violated? caraher Oct 2013 #16
Conservation of Energy PamW Oct 2013 #17
20% is at most a rough limit with no grid upgrades and no storage caraher Oct 2013 #20
That's not "at most"... it's exactly what they're saying. FBaggins Oct 2013 #21
Try to find the 1992 National Academy Energy Study PamW Oct 2013 #24
Well said & well sourced. FogerRox Oct 2013 #26
Well said K. FogerRox Oct 2013 #27
So many assumptions... I am sad for you. wundermaus Oct 2013 #23
So is the Hindenberg PamW Oct 2013 #25
Look, the only way we can sustain modern industrial society without fossil fuels is nuclear power. hunter Oct 2013 #13
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Britain to build Europe's...»Reply #23