Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)Myth: 15% Ethanol Fuel Will Destroy My Engine [View all]
http://www.fuelfreedom.org/myth-15-ethanol-fuel-will-destroy-my-engine/(emphases my own)
The testing conducted by the Coordinating Research Council (CRC) neither captures nor represents the reality of the U.S. car market. More than 80% of the miles driven in the United States are on cars that are less than 10 years old, yet 7 of the 15 cars tested were past their product useful life of 10 years. Only one car was a late model year a 2009 Honda Accord. It should not be surprising that a 1996 Toyota Camry, 5 years past its useful life, with a Kelley Blue Book value of $3,750, did not perform well under stringent testing conditions.
The test did not use the 15% ethanol blend (E15) that new standards call for. Instead, they used Aggressive E20. The word aggressive means the addition of sulfuric acid and hydrochloric acid to the fuel mix (ph of 2.8). Needless to say, standard car parts were never built to withstand acid in the fuel. Moreover, ethanol in water is a slight base; hence any resulting corrosion does not resemble corrosion due to acid exposure. (Note: Off-the shelf E10 that was NOT aggressive was used for the control test.)
Water in the fuel is a strong abrasive. The water content of their Aggressive E20 blend was raised to the top of the legal limit. Commercially sold ethanol has about half of that water content.
The study specifies that: The project oversight panel specified the aromatic level of the base gasoline (prior to ethanol blending) to approximately 40% volume. In other words, per the request of non-scientist auto and oil representatives, CRC increased the percentage of octane-enhancing aromatics in the fuel to 40% 10% more than the normal fuel aromatics content of 30%. This change, in turn, enabled CRC to use 80-octane fuel, which has less tolerance for water, despite the fact that the minimum sold in the U.S. is 84-octane. Running the test on 80-octane fuel caused the water they added to the fuel to become an even stronger abrasive.
(more)
38 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
all the detroit car manufacterers make them, but... they make no effort to take advantage of
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#2
No effort at all. In the 1998 Ethanol Vehicle Challenge, 13 college engineering student teams
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#8
we can use methanol & produce it cheaper than ethanol & in enough volume to totally replace gasoline
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#13
alas if we wait for the perfect fuel, or for electrics to save us, the Earth will burn. all we can
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#22
3 MIT scientists went further, Dirctly Injectng ethanol, turbo-charging & downsizing boosted mpg 30%
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#9
NREL review of E15 effects on MY2001 and later cars finds no meaningful differences with E10
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#23
Really....will they pay to overhaul my early 70's and later 40's vehicles...
Historic NY
Oct 2013
#26
do I need to repeat the title of the study for you or 'splain the meaning of '2001' to you?
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#29
all the legitimate research on this shows ethanol is a net energy gainer, unlike gasoline (.81)
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#11
one of the founders i know is an internet software designer billionaire. OF course, at least one of
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#12
Farrell et al found Ethn ENergy balance positive, found Pimentel & Patzek's findings highly dubious
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#20
Here is NREL's 2012 test of vehicles using E0, E10, E15, E20 for 60k, 90k and 120k miles. IF there
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#24
GW is on course to start feeding on itself. I believe the best we can do is mitigate the disaster
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#18
Elsie seems to be showing an unusual reaction to that new corn Monsanto requires me to grow for feed
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#28
nothing legitimate in CRCs 'study' adding sulfuric acid to E20 saying it was E15, it's FRAUD
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#19
in wet milling Sulfuric acid is used but this is b4 centrifuging & distillation after fermentation
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#32
it's way out.....pHe not less than 6.5 per astm D-6423 (ASTM D 4806 refers to D6423)
Bill USA
Oct 2013
#36