Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Arctic Methane - This Does Not Sound Good... [View all]OKIsItJustMe
(21,734 posts)29. “Solar power is totally uneconomic“
Last edited Tue Dec 13, 2011, 01:55 PM - Edit history (1)
http://www.queensu.ca/news/articles/solar-power-much-cheaper-produce-most-analysts-realize-study-finds[font face="Times, Serif"][font size="5"]Solar power much cheaper to produce than most analysts realize, study finds[/font]
2011-12-07
The public is being kept in the dark about the viability of solar photovoltaic energy, according to a study conducted at Queens University.
Many analysts project a higher cost for solar photovoltaic energy because they dont consider recent technological advancements and price reductions, says Joshua Pearce, Adjunct Professor, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering. Older models for determining solar photovoltaic energy costs are too conservative.
Dr. Pearce believes solar photovoltaic systems are near the tipping point where they can produce energy for about the same price other traditional sources of energy.
Dr. Pearce says some studies dont consider the 70 per cent reduction in the cost of solar panels since 2009 . Furthermore, he says research now shows the productivity of top-of-the-line solar panels only drops between 0.1 and 0.2 percent annually, which is much less than the one per cent used in many cost analyses.
[/font]
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.104
2011-12-07
The public is being kept in the dark about the viability of solar photovoltaic energy, according to a study conducted at Queens University.
Many analysts project a higher cost for solar photovoltaic energy because they dont consider recent technological advancements and price reductions, says Joshua Pearce, Adjunct Professor, Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering. Older models for determining solar photovoltaic energy costs are too conservative.
Dr. Pearce believes solar photovoltaic systems are near the tipping point where they can produce energy for about the same price other traditional sources of energy.
Dr. Pearce says some studies dont consider the 70 per cent reduction in the cost of solar panels since 2009 . Furthermore, he says research now shows the productivity of top-of-the-line solar panels only drops between 0.1 and 0.2 percent annually, which is much less than the one per cent used in many cost analyses.
[/font]
See also: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1127&pid=591
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I was rendered immediately breathless, and was made to sit and meditate deeply
Ghost Dog
Dec 2011
#43
I didn't do well in chemistry class (bad teacher, I claim) but does this make sense
Ghost Dog
Dec 2011
#47
I'm not sure that's technically feasible, we're talking thousands of square kilometers.
joshcryer
Dec 2011
#55
Luckily, I have no kids! My ancestral carbon footprint shrinks to zero by 2040.
aletier_v
Dec 2011
#53
Right, a little over a long time is nothing, a lot over a little time is an issue.
joshcryer
Dec 2011
#59
