Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,678 posts)
3. Which, of course, will never happen.
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 10:11 AM
Nov 2013

2024 is when the initial 40-year license runs out. In order to extend it, they would also need to perform some expensive maintenance (e.g., replace steam generators). $12 Billion plus those costs would be awfully close to the price of a pair of new reactors that would last for 60 years... so why would they even consider paying that amount for a mere 10-20 years?

Of course... even more likely is that they just agree on a far less costly alternative such as extending the pipes farther into the ocean and/or adding screens to the intakes. A few hundred million is cheap as part of a 20-year extension.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Diablo Canyon needs to sp...»Reply #3