Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Thorium vehicle will run 100 years on 8 grams of fuel [View all]johnd83
(593 posts)7. I think you misunderstand my point
In a Uranium reactor there is the risk that if the control rods are damaged or the fuel melts an uncontrolled chain reaction can occur. With Thorium this is not possible because an outside excitation is needed to create the U233. Decay heat still exists, but newer Thorium reactors either use passive cooling or are based on a liquid fluoride core that is not as susceptible to overheating. Newer reactors are actually walk-away safe, the problem with Fukishima was that it was a very old (and poorly done) design that should have been shut down decades ago.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think for the next 100 years or so it is going to be mostly manned/unmanned craft
johnd83
Nov 2013
#10
That's if your concern is momentum per unit energy; but often it's not, in rockets
muriel_volestrangler
Nov 2013
#43
Well, yes, that's the point - you use nuclear power, or solar (ie external)
muriel_volestrangler
Nov 2013
#45
Does anyone have the faintest idea what process is being claimed here?
muriel_volestrangler
Nov 2013
#24
I'll try to post on it later - basically, you can increase decay rate by jiggling it with a laser
bananas
Nov 2013
#33