Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

(3,249 posts)

11. OK, I get that, but .....

Sat Nov 9, 2013, 10:56 AM

Nov 2013

..... I was thinking more on the lines of GDP / unit of labor.

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/labor-productivity.asp

It seems you are talking more about standard of living rather than productivity. But that's OK.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

35 years of global energy efficiency gains reflected in the world's GDP [View all] GliderGuider Nov 2013 OP

I think your formula is wrong LouisvilleDem Nov 2013 #1

If the economy was truly decoupled from energy GliderGuider Nov 2013 #2

I see where I got confused now LouisvilleDem Nov 2013 #12

What do you think the measure of ..... oldhippie Nov 2013 #4

But I wasn't talking about "success", but "productivity" ...... oldhippie Nov 2013 #8

OK, I get that, but ..... oldhippie Nov 2013 #11

Confuses cause and effect. FBaggins Nov 2013 #6

"Growth" isn't always a good thing. hunter Nov 2013 #7

You can't separate cause and effect in this process. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #10