Environment & Energy

ramapo

(4,775 posts)

6. We will see

Sat Nov 16, 2013, 09:45 AM

Nov 2013

I agree that that nuclear offers many advantages over the fossil fuels. The problem is one bad nuke can turn into an almost unimaginable catastrophe that quickly becomes competitive with all the human health destruction caused by the fossil fuels. Scary as it was initially, Chernobyl turned out to be a bad industrial accident that had the unseen advantage of creating a wonderful nature preserve in the forbidden zone. (Flame on folks). If the Fukushima operators succeed in pulling out the fuel without creating a disaster, then this one too will turn out to be pretty awful but not horribly catastrophic, at least in the human cost.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fukushima apocalypse: Years of ‘duct tape fixes’ could result in ‘millions of deaths’ [View all] madokie Nov 2013 OP

Frightful. nt snappyturtle Nov 2013 #1

This terrifies me GladRagDahl Nov 2013 #2

And what'll really get you madokie Nov 2013 #3

:/ GladRagDahl Nov 2013 #16

Bullshit. Nuclear energy saves lives, and all the coal and gas burned to spread paranoid NNadir Nov 2013 #4

Its pretty obvious what is happening in Fukushima today madokie Nov 2013 #5

Let's see, you actually believe that as you put it, that your paranoid nuclear scare stories... NNadir Nov 2013 #17

Yup madokie Nov 2013 #24

Fukushima in PERSPECTIVE courtesy of Berkeley Professor PamW Nov 2013 #18

We'll see won't we madokie Nov 2013 #25

We agree on one thing... PamW Nov 2013 #34

a 16 month old story from the Wall Street Journal? Bennyboy Nov 2013 #27

Muller's article is still timely... PamW Nov 2013 #33

We will see ramapo Nov 2013 #6

Always look on the bright side eh? zeemike Nov 2013 #7

"what if the Pacific is contaminated"? Thor_MN Nov 2013 #10

It is not over the top at all. zeemike Nov 2013 #11

It's OPINION PamW Nov 2013 #20

Add it up...the least of them contains 50 tons. zeemike Nov 2013 #21

It's more complicated than that... PamW Nov 2013 #31

So you are telling us you are a scientist then? zeemike Nov 2013 #36

Think about it.. PamW Nov 2013 #37

"The pool contains 1,533 fuel rod assemblies, 202 of which are fresh" kristopher Nov 2013 #42

OK - let's assume 202 are fresh. PamW Nov 2013 #43

That's the wrong "fresh" FBaggins Nov 2013 #44

Well I have to thank you because you have caused me to read up on it. zeemike Nov 2013 #45

Perspective!!! PamW Nov 2013 #19

Then why did the evacuate the place? zeemike Nov 2013 #22

You've got to be kidding... PamW Nov 2013 #32

Frankly that sounds delusional to me. zeemike Nov 2013 #35

You forgot to attack Amory Lovins. You're losing your edge. kestrel91316 Nov 2013 #9

Who is this "World's most predominate climate scientist"? MyNameGoesHere Nov 2013 #12

If you don't know who James Hansen is... caraher Nov 2013 #14

Ok. MyNameGoesHere Nov 2013 #15

I'm sure TEPCO will accept your volunteer work, then Scootaloo Nov 2013 #26

I have to finish reading this later. liberalla Nov 2013 #8

Considering the fact that we call ourselves "The Master Race", ConcernedCanuk Nov 2013 #13

Could you provide us with a little background on 'fallout researcher Christina Consolo', ... CRH Nov 2013 #23

Christina Consolo is a fucking ophthalmologist! NickB79 Nov 2013 #28

I thought she invented duct tape miyazaki Nov 2013 #29

Thats all I could find too! ... Oh Well. n/t CRH Nov 2013 #30

Mighty selective head-banging you are engaging in... kristopher Nov 2013 #40

You do have a small point there NickB79 Nov 2013 #41

is ...criticality... really a possibility? quadrature Nov 2013 #38

Criticality is NOT a possibility PamW Nov 2013 #39