Environment & Energy

PamW

(1,825 posts)

33. Muller's article is still timely...

Sun Nov 17, 2013, 02:46 PM

Nov 2013

Bennyboy,

Professor Muller's article is still timely; because even with new cracks and new problems of the recent past; the radiation release rate at Fukushima is NO WHERE NEAR what it was back in March 2011.

What we have now are little upticks in the amount of radiation release; but no MASSIVE changes.

Professor Muller's article was written AFTER the vast majority of radiation was released; and the little upticks due to new cracks, or spilled water; don't change the major conclusion of Professor Muller's article.

Even with all the recent upticks; the radiation levels at Fukushima are still about ONE-THIRD that of Denver.

The good thing about science is that it is true, whether or not you believe in it.
--Neil deGrasse Tyson

PamW

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fukushima apocalypse: Years of ‘duct tape fixes’ could result in ‘millions of deaths’ [View all] madokie Nov 2013 OP

Frightful. nt snappyturtle Nov 2013 #1

This terrifies me GladRagDahl Nov 2013 #2

And what'll really get you madokie Nov 2013 #3

:/ GladRagDahl Nov 2013 #16

Bullshit. Nuclear energy saves lives, and all the coal and gas burned to spread paranoid NNadir Nov 2013 #4

Its pretty obvious what is happening in Fukushima today madokie Nov 2013 #5

Let's see, you actually believe that as you put it, that your paranoid nuclear scare stories... NNadir Nov 2013 #17

Yup madokie Nov 2013 #24

Fukushima in PERSPECTIVE courtesy of Berkeley Professor PamW Nov 2013 #18

We'll see won't we madokie Nov 2013 #25

We agree on one thing... PamW Nov 2013 #34

a 16 month old story from the Wall Street Journal? Bennyboy Nov 2013 #27

Muller's article is still timely... PamW Nov 2013 #33

We will see ramapo Nov 2013 #6

Always look on the bright side eh? zeemike Nov 2013 #7

"what if the Pacific is contaminated"? Thor_MN Nov 2013 #10

It is not over the top at all. zeemike Nov 2013 #11

It's OPINION PamW Nov 2013 #20

Add it up...the least of them contains 50 tons. zeemike Nov 2013 #21

It's more complicated than that... PamW Nov 2013 #31

So you are telling us you are a scientist then? zeemike Nov 2013 #36

Think about it.. PamW Nov 2013 #37

"The pool contains 1,533 fuel rod assemblies, 202 of which are fresh" kristopher Nov 2013 #42

OK - let's assume 202 are fresh. PamW Nov 2013 #43

That's the wrong "fresh" FBaggins Nov 2013 #44

Well I have to thank you because you have caused me to read up on it. zeemike Nov 2013 #45

Perspective!!! PamW Nov 2013 #19

Then why did the evacuate the place? zeemike Nov 2013 #22

You've got to be kidding... PamW Nov 2013 #32

Frankly that sounds delusional to me. zeemike Nov 2013 #35

You forgot to attack Amory Lovins. You're losing your edge. kestrel91316 Nov 2013 #9

Who is this "World's most predominate climate scientist"? MyNameGoesHere Nov 2013 #12

If you don't know who James Hansen is... caraher Nov 2013 #14

Ok. MyNameGoesHere Nov 2013 #15

I'm sure TEPCO will accept your volunteer work, then Scootaloo Nov 2013 #26

I have to finish reading this later. liberalla Nov 2013 #8

Considering the fact that we call ourselves "The Master Race", ConcernedCanuk Nov 2013 #13

Could you provide us with a little background on 'fallout researcher Christina Consolo', ... CRH Nov 2013 #23

Christina Consolo is a fucking ophthalmologist! NickB79 Nov 2013 #28

I thought she invented duct tape miyazaki Nov 2013 #29

Thats all I could find too! ... Oh Well. n/t CRH Nov 2013 #30

Mighty selective head-banging you are engaging in... kristopher Nov 2013 #40

You do have a small point there NickB79 Nov 2013 #41

is ...criticality... really a possibility? quadrature Nov 2013 #38

Criticality is NOT a possibility PamW Nov 2013 #39