Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)TEPCO risks all at Fukushima [View all]
http://atimes.com/atimes/Japan/JAP-02-181113.html
TEPCO risks all at Fukushima
By Victor Kotsev
Nov 18, '13
On Monday, by far the most dangerous nuclear operation attempted in human history was set to begin in the crippled Fukushima Daiichi power plant in Japan, the removal of more than 1,300 spent fuel rods and some 200 unused rods from a reservoir on top of Unit 4.
While the undertaking is necessary, the worst-case scenario would pale in comparison the triple meltdowns of 2011 and necessitate the evacuation of the capital Tokyo.
Experts are unanimous that the engineering challenges are on a scale unseen to date, given that the fuel pool was damaged in a fire caused by a cooling failure and a subsequent explosion during the meltdowns. If the fuel rods, some of which may be damaged, come too close to each other, there is a chance that the nuclear chain reaction would resume, which would be catastrophic in the presence of so much fissile material, as well as extremely difficult to stop.
If, on the other hand, a fuel rod breaks or is exposed to air and ignites, this would release into the atmosphere a massive amount of radiation, likely necessitating the evacuation of the plant. The total amount of radiation present in the pool is estimated at 14,000 times that released by the atomic bomb dropped at Hiroshima, or about the same as in the combined cores of the three reactors that melted down.
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
she probably means moving them deep into the southern hemisphere, like Australia. n/t
CRH
Nov 2013
#16
If I understand what the "worst case scenario" involves, I'm not sure any place will be safe.
Lochloosa
Nov 2013
#17
It's not about how many have been killed to date. It's about the catastrophic consequences of a
magical thyme
Nov 2013
#4
What's wrong? Aside from the point that you don't understand the meaning of 'values'?
kristopher
Nov 2013
#15
They haven't had it right so far, they had better be right now. Where are these rods going?
marble falls
Nov 2013
#5