Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PamW

(1,825 posts)
43. OK - let's assume 202 are fresh.
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 07:24 PM
Nov 2013

kristopher,

OK - we'll assume that 202 are fresh, hence highly radioactive, and hence capable of melting and releasing their stored inventory of radioactivity.

The other fuel rods have spent time in the pool so as to have the decay heat exponentially decay so they can't melt. If they can't melt, then the radioactive material that is trapped within them will stay trapped; just as the pigment in my water glass analogy above.

Now the statement was made in post #11 that the potential for radioactive release exceeded all the releases of atmospheric nuclear tests

http://www.democraticunderground.com/112757547#post11

So the question is whether the radioactivity in the 202 assemblies exceeds the radioactivity released in all the atmospheric nuclear tests.

By way of comparison; one of the consequences of the releases due to atmospheric test is the release to the environment of 10 metric tonnes of Plutonium:

http://www.clarku.edu/departments/marsh/projects/community/plutonium.pdf

From page 5:

About 10 metric tons of plutonium were released into the atmosphere during these tests.

The mass of 10 metric tonnes is 10,000 kilograms or roughly 22,000 pounds. ( A metric tonne is about 1.1 short tons )

So do you think that there are 22,000 pounds of fission products in the 202 assemblies? NO WAY!!

So using your own figures; the claim that this would release more radiation than all the atmospheric nuclear tests is a clear EXAGGERATION.

Q.E.D.

PamW

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Frightful. nt snappyturtle Nov 2013 #1
This terrifies me GladRagDahl Nov 2013 #2
And what'll really get you madokie Nov 2013 #3
:/ GladRagDahl Nov 2013 #16
Bullshit. Nuclear energy saves lives, and all the coal and gas burned to spread paranoid NNadir Nov 2013 #4
Its pretty obvious what is happening in Fukushima today madokie Nov 2013 #5
Let's see, you actually believe that as you put it, that your paranoid nuclear scare stories... NNadir Nov 2013 #17
Yup madokie Nov 2013 #24
Fukushima in PERSPECTIVE courtesy of Berkeley Professor PamW Nov 2013 #18
We'll see won't we madokie Nov 2013 #25
We agree on one thing... PamW Nov 2013 #34
a 16 month old story from the Wall Street Journal? Bennyboy Nov 2013 #27
Muller's article is still timely... PamW Nov 2013 #33
We will see ramapo Nov 2013 #6
Always look on the bright side eh? zeemike Nov 2013 #7
"what if the Pacific is contaminated"? Thor_MN Nov 2013 #10
It is not over the top at all. zeemike Nov 2013 #11
It's OPINION PamW Nov 2013 #20
Add it up...the least of them contains 50 tons. zeemike Nov 2013 #21
It's more complicated than that... PamW Nov 2013 #31
So you are telling us you are a scientist then? zeemike Nov 2013 #36
Think about it.. PamW Nov 2013 #37
"The pool contains 1,533 fuel rod assemblies, 202 of which are fresh" kristopher Nov 2013 #42
OK - let's assume 202 are fresh. PamW Nov 2013 #43
That's the wrong "fresh" FBaggins Nov 2013 #44
Well I have to thank you because you have caused me to read up on it. zeemike Nov 2013 #45
Perspective!!! PamW Nov 2013 #19
Then why did the evacuate the place? zeemike Nov 2013 #22
You've got to be kidding... PamW Nov 2013 #32
Frankly that sounds delusional to me. zeemike Nov 2013 #35
You forgot to attack Amory Lovins. You're losing your edge. kestrel91316 Nov 2013 #9
Who is this "World's most predominate climate scientist"? MyNameGoesHere Nov 2013 #12
If you don't know who James Hansen is... caraher Nov 2013 #14
Ok. MyNameGoesHere Nov 2013 #15
I'm sure TEPCO will accept your volunteer work, then Scootaloo Nov 2013 #26
I have to finish reading this later. liberalla Nov 2013 #8
Considering the fact that we call ourselves "The Master Race", ConcernedCanuk Nov 2013 #13
Could you provide us with a little background on 'fallout researcher Christina Consolo', ... CRH Nov 2013 #23
Christina Consolo is a fucking ophthalmologist! NickB79 Nov 2013 #28
I thought she invented duct tape miyazaki Nov 2013 #29
Thats all I could find too! ... Oh Well. n/t CRH Nov 2013 #30
Mighty selective head-banging you are engaging in... kristopher Nov 2013 #40
You do have a small point there NickB79 Nov 2013 #41
is ...criticality... really a possibility? quadrature Nov 2013 #38
Criticality is NOT a possibility PamW Nov 2013 #39
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Fukushima apocalypse: Yea...»Reply #43