Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
45. Well I have to thank you because you have caused me to read up on it.
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 09:57 PM
Nov 2013

And it is even worse than I thought...and I new it was a dangerous situation but not just how dangerous it really is...for instance here is a description of just one of those thousand or more fuel rods...

Pressurized water reactor (PWR) fuel consists of cylindrical rods put into bundles. A uranium oxide ceramic is formed into pellets and inserted into Zircaloy tubes that are bundled together. The Zircaloy tubes are about 1 cm in diameter, and the fuel cladding gap is filled with helium gas to improve the conduction of heat from the fuel to the cladding. There are about 179-264 fuel rods per fuel bundle and about 121 to 193 fuel bundles are loaded into a reactor core. Generally, the fuel bundles consist of fuel rods bundled 14×14 to 17×17. PWR fuel bundles are about 4 meters long. In PWR fuel bundles, control rods are inserted through the top directly into the fuel bundle. The fuel bundles usually are enriched several percent in 235U. The uranium oxide is dried before inserting into the tubes to try to eliminate moisture in the ceramic fuel that can lead to corrosion and hydrogen embrittlement. The Zircaloy tubes are pressurized with helium to try to minimize pellet-cladding interaction which can lead to fuel rod failure over long periods.

BWR fuel[edit]
In boiling water reactors (BWR), the fuel is similar to PWR fuel except that the bundles are "canned"; that is, there is a thin tube surrounding each bundle. This is primarily done to prevent local density variations from affecting neutronics and thermal hydraulics of the reactor core. In modern BWR fuel bundles, there are either 91, 92, or 96 fuel rods per assembly depending on the manufacturer. A range between 368 assemblies for the smallest and 800 assemblies for the largest U.S. BWR forms the reactor core. Each BWR fuel rod is back filled with helium to a pressure of about three atmospheres (300 kPa).


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Frightful. nt snappyturtle Nov 2013 #1
This terrifies me GladRagDahl Nov 2013 #2
And what'll really get you madokie Nov 2013 #3
:/ GladRagDahl Nov 2013 #16
Bullshit. Nuclear energy saves lives, and all the coal and gas burned to spread paranoid NNadir Nov 2013 #4
Its pretty obvious what is happening in Fukushima today madokie Nov 2013 #5
Let's see, you actually believe that as you put it, that your paranoid nuclear scare stories... NNadir Nov 2013 #17
Yup madokie Nov 2013 #24
Fukushima in PERSPECTIVE courtesy of Berkeley Professor PamW Nov 2013 #18
We'll see won't we madokie Nov 2013 #25
We agree on one thing... PamW Nov 2013 #34
a 16 month old story from the Wall Street Journal? Bennyboy Nov 2013 #27
Muller's article is still timely... PamW Nov 2013 #33
We will see ramapo Nov 2013 #6
Always look on the bright side eh? zeemike Nov 2013 #7
"what if the Pacific is contaminated"? Thor_MN Nov 2013 #10
It is not over the top at all. zeemike Nov 2013 #11
It's OPINION PamW Nov 2013 #20
Add it up...the least of them contains 50 tons. zeemike Nov 2013 #21
It's more complicated than that... PamW Nov 2013 #31
So you are telling us you are a scientist then? zeemike Nov 2013 #36
Think about it.. PamW Nov 2013 #37
"The pool contains 1,533 fuel rod assemblies, 202 of which are fresh" kristopher Nov 2013 #42
OK - let's assume 202 are fresh. PamW Nov 2013 #43
That's the wrong "fresh" FBaggins Nov 2013 #44
Well I have to thank you because you have caused me to read up on it. zeemike Nov 2013 #45
Perspective!!! PamW Nov 2013 #19
Then why did the evacuate the place? zeemike Nov 2013 #22
You've got to be kidding... PamW Nov 2013 #32
Frankly that sounds delusional to me. zeemike Nov 2013 #35
You forgot to attack Amory Lovins. You're losing your edge. kestrel91316 Nov 2013 #9
Who is this "World's most predominate climate scientist"? MyNameGoesHere Nov 2013 #12
If you don't know who James Hansen is... caraher Nov 2013 #14
Ok. MyNameGoesHere Nov 2013 #15
I'm sure TEPCO will accept your volunteer work, then Scootaloo Nov 2013 #26
I have to finish reading this later. liberalla Nov 2013 #8
Considering the fact that we call ourselves "The Master Race", ConcernedCanuk Nov 2013 #13
Could you provide us with a little background on 'fallout researcher Christina Consolo', ... CRH Nov 2013 #23
Christina Consolo is a fucking ophthalmologist! NickB79 Nov 2013 #28
I thought she invented duct tape miyazaki Nov 2013 #29
Thats all I could find too! ... Oh Well. n/t CRH Nov 2013 #30
Mighty selective head-banging you are engaging in... kristopher Nov 2013 #40
You do have a small point there NickB79 Nov 2013 #41
is ...criticality... really a possibility? quadrature Nov 2013 #38
Criticality is NOT a possibility PamW Nov 2013 #39
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Fukushima apocalypse: Yea...»Reply #45