Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

(21,088 posts)

7. How much exactness do you need?

Fri Nov 22, 2013, 03:29 PM

Nov 2013

Nuclear power has enough strikes against it that CO2 emissions within +/- 50% would be utterly immaterial, to my way of thinking.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Oh for chrissake! That idiot James Hansen is at it again!!!! [View all] GliderGuider Nov 2013 OP

Exploring Hansen's position(s) a little more deeply GliderGuider Nov 2013 #1

Not to mention all the co2 madokie Nov 2013 #2

According to the IPCC GliderGuider Nov 2013 #3

That page is in dispute madokie Nov 2013 #6

How much exactness do you need? GliderGuider Nov 2013 #7

I know it appears cruel to say this, ... CRH Nov 2013 #4

Not cruel, utterly realistic. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #5

I'll stay tuned, ... CRH Nov 2013 #8

In the 60-year history of nuclear power GliderGuider Nov 2013 #10