Environment & Energy

PamW

(1,825 posts)

31. 100% WRONG!! AGAIN!!

Reply to intaglio (Reply #29)

Fri Nov 22, 2013, 05:21 PM

Nov 2013

intaglio,

Go find me an actinide with a ZERO fission cross-section!!!

You are LYING and you know it.

PamW

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

105 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Russia Unveils Detailed Plans To Build 21 New Nuclear Power Units By 2030 [View all] FBaggins Nov 2013 OP

Mother Russia! nt Xipe Totec Nov 2013 #1

Do they have any detailed plans about how they are going to dismantle them in 20 -50 years? intaglio Nov 2013 #2

Nope to the first question. FBaggins Nov 2013 #3

A-a-a-nd where do they bury the high level waste? intaglio Nov 2013 #5

You don't understand... PamW Nov 2013 #6

Absolute and complete rubbish, indeed deliberately misleading intaglio Nov 2013 #10

Do you really not get it? FBaggins Nov 2013 #13

YES!! PamW Nov 2013 #15

So you are saying that long lived radio-isotopes are not present in nuclear waste. intaglio Nov 2013 #16

Nope... I'm not saying that. Nor most of the rest of your imagined statements. FBaggins Nov 2013 #20

This is like pulling teeth.... PamW Nov 2013 #21

So you or your guru are claiming that reprocessing is 100% efficient intaglio Nov 2013 #25

I explained that earlier. PamW Nov 2013 #33

100% WRONG as ALWAYS PamW Nov 2013 #74

So the Zirconium for the cladding is reprocessed into what exactly? intaglio Nov 2013 #75

In the self-contiained IFR fuel cycle... PamW Nov 2013 #83

Intaglio, I have been reading this Kelvin Mace Nov 2013 #26

LIAR LIAR has no links PamW Nov 2013 #32

I would really prefer less accusation of lying Kelvin Mace Nov 2013 #40

Scientific ILLITERACY rears its head again!! PamW Nov 2013 #14

Illiterate? intaglio Nov 2013 #17

100% WRONG!! AGAIN!! PamW Nov 2013 #22

Ignoramus intaglio Nov 2013 #28

GEESH PamW Nov 2013 #36

You are unaware of the processes in fused salt reactors intaglio Nov 2013 #45

SPECIFICS??? PamW Nov 2013 #49

If you had anything to do with science intaglio Nov 2013 #50

MORE ERRORS!!! PamW Nov 2013 #51

Is learning new (to you) terminology beyond your capabilities? caraher Nov 2013 #58

U238 will not sustain a chain reaction intaglio Nov 2013 #61

Typical IN the box "thinking" PamW Nov 2013 #57

It is necessary for nuclear fuels to sustain a chain reaction intaglio Nov 2013 #63

I explained that PamW Nov 2013 #67

I cant understand why this is being questioned!! PamW Nov 2013 #68

And since I have asked this question of the other side Kelvin Mace Nov 2013 #35

The punchline... PamW Nov 2013 #56

A question please Kelvin Mace Nov 2013 #34

NOPE!!! PamW Nov 2013 #37

Thank you.. Kelvin Mace Nov 2013 #41

NOPE!! PamW Nov 2013 #44

So, the impurities in the water that do become radioactive Kelvin Mace Nov 2013 #46

Look at the NRC diagram... PamW Nov 2013 #47

Well that's kind of what I said Kelvin Mace Nov 2013 #59

EXACTLY!! Give yourself an "A+" PamW Nov 2013 #69

And how does the fluid in the primary cooling circuit move through that circuit? intaglio Nov 2013 #62

Pumps are used. PamW Nov 2013 #70

An EXTREMELY small amount... PamW Nov 2013 #90

Thank you again Kelvin Mace Nov 2013 #97

Some more interesting facts. PamW Nov 2013 #98

Hmmmm... Kelvin Mace Nov 2013 #99

I don't think so... PamW Nov 2013 #100

Not even the CEO & other senior management of TEPCO? GliderGuider Nov 2013 #101

TEPCO - I'll grant you TEPCO PamW Nov 2013 #103

I am talking reality, not the law Kelvin Mace Nov 2013 #104

Which waste would that be? FBaggins Nov 2013 #12

Oh, fun intaglio Nov 2013 #18

Hillarious that you find such errors to be "fun" FBaggins Nov 2013 #23

And how long will the land beneath those dams be uninhabitable? intaglio Nov 2013 #38

Prof Muller and the Panic of Fukushima PamW Nov 2013 #48

Let's take those in reverse order FBaggins Nov 2013 #65

The dry well is no longer part of primary containment because it is breached intaglio Nov 2013 #66

100% WRONG as ALWAYS!! PamW Nov 2013 #71

Reference to facts not in evidence... PamW Nov 2013 #105

WRONG about MOX PamW Nov 2013 #24

Contrary to what you may have heard... PamW Nov 2013 #4

Sorry but I live in a country with as long a history as any of dismantling intaglio Nov 2013 #7

BALONEY!!! PamW Nov 2013 #9

Then check out about Calder Hall intaglio Nov 2013 #11

Gofman was DISCREDITED LONG AGO!! PamW Nov 2013 #27

Not what you said about actinides. n/t intaglio Nov 2013 #29

100% WRONG!! AGAIN!! PamW Nov 2013 #31

I gave you examples intaglio Nov 2013 #39

100% WRONG!! AGAIN!! PamW Nov 2013 #52

You don't know the Gofman story... PamW Nov 2013 #54

Windscale dismantled. PamW Nov 2013 #30

The name of the site is Sellafield now intaglio Nov 2013 #43

Windscale is still used for the two reactors. PamW Nov 2013 #53

NOTE: couldn't specify the isotope!! PamW Nov 2013 #73

Russia doubles down on "The Hard Path" kristopher Nov 2013 #8

It doesn't surprise me at all that Russia is doing this. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #19

Concentrated power likes...concentrated power. Iterate Nov 2013 #64

A Chernobyl in every pot and a Fukushima in every garage FiveGoodMen Nov 2013 #42

Just another veiled way CFLDem Nov 2013 #55

"Green" hasn't replaced fossil fuels or nuclear power anywhere. hunter Nov 2013 #60

AMEN to that!! PamW Nov 2013 #72

Green is not " compatible " because we dont let it to be!!!!! darkangel218 Nov 2013 #77

You, personally, can quit fossil fuels any time you like. hunter Nov 2013 #81

As I recall... PamW Nov 2013 #84

I'm PG&E hunter Nov 2013 #87

Actually, I took the numbers off the PG&E website... PamW Nov 2013 #91

Fucking sickos!! darkangel218 Nov 2013 #76

0.1% of the power used in the world today GliderGuider Nov 2013 #78

My thoughts Aaron8418 Nov 2013 #79

What people are dying due to nuclear waste? PamW Nov 2013 #82

Nobody will die because of Fukushima?? darkangel218 Nov 2013 #88

That sucks. There should not be one more nuke plant built on this planet Cleita Nov 2013 #80

What evidence???? PamW Nov 2013 #85

What evidence do you have that radioactive waste is Cleita Nov 2013 #86

Where did I say radioactive waste was harmless? PamW Nov 2013 #92

You sure know a LOT about the industry. Cleita Nov 2013 #96

Holy shit....you mustv be jk right??? darkangel218 Nov 2013 #89

Do you realize... PamW Nov 2013 #93

Do you realize that youre beating a dead horse? darkangel218 Nov 2013 #94

RUN AWAY, RUN AWAY, RUN AWAY..... PamW Nov 2013 #95

yes because Chernobyl was such a success. MFM008 Nov 2013 #102