Russia Unveils Detailed Plans To Build 21 New Nuclear Power Units By 2030

[PamW]

53. Windscale is still used for the two reactors.

Yes - I know the site is "Sellafield"; but the two original reactors are still called Windscale.

You keep arguing; but you NEVER do what I ask. You agree that there were TWO Windscale reactors as shown in the picture.

Now go fire up Google Earth or Bing Aerial and LOOK AT SELLAFIELD

Try to find the two reactors. You will only find ONE

One of the reactors has been dismantled. You claim above that something was buried in place.

OK - Windscale 1 may have been buried in place. What is stopping the UK from burying Windscale 2 in place.

I.e. Britain could do with Windscale 2 EXACTLY what they did with Windscale 1.

If it was acceptable to demolish Windscale 1 and bury it in place; then the UK could do the exact same thing with Windscale 2.

There's NOTHING stopping you from doing the same thing to Windscale 2.

If someone claims it is too radioactive to touch Windscale 2; then why wasn't the SAME true for Windscale 1.

The UK dismantled and buried ONE of a pair of TWIN reactors; and now intaglio wants to claim that the disposal of the second Windscale reactor is some type of INSURMOUNTABLE problem.

Do with Windscale 2 what you did with Windscale 1.

SIMPLE as THAT. However, I'm going to guess that intaglio will still portray it as some unsolvable problem.

PamW