Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(37,665 posts)
9. How many people in the 60 year history of nuclear power were killed by...
Sun Nov 24, 2013, 10:25 PM
Nov 2013

reactors.

As many as will die in the next 5 hours from air pollution?

According to the Lancet analysis of risk factors and the burden of related diseases, a systematic overview of 21 world regions authored by a myriad of authors from around the world, outdoor particulate air pollution killed around 3.2 million people and indoor air pollution about 3.5 million people in 2010.

Lancet http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(12)61766-8/abstract

Lancet 2012; 380: 2224–60

Hansen gets it, because he's not a mathematical illiterate paranoid who states his own "beliefs" as if they are facts.

There is not one fucking paranoid on this planet who burns oil and gas to carry on insipidly about Fukushima who can point to as many deaths from the whole fucking affair as air pollution will kill in the next ten minutes.

And I note that there is not one fucking Fukushima paranoid on this planet who gives a shit that buildings, cars, trucks, oil refineries in the same damn quake caused 20,000 deaths. How come we never hear from this set of dumbbells that supporters of buildings have cognitive dissonance because buildings cause deaths in earthquakes and tsunamis?

Is there one paranoid anti-nuke who can demonstrate risk linked body burdens from all the radiation released at Fukushima that are likely to kill twenty people over the next twenty years. 50 people? A number of people who will die in the next hour from air pollution?

And yet...and yet...we have asinine statements about what is and what is not "cognitive dissonance."

Hansen's totally and completely right. His paper is irrefutable. Nuclear power saves lives, and it saves the environment and it follows that anti-nuke ignorance kills people.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Oh for chrissake! That i...»Reply #9