Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,678 posts)
18. Nope.
Mon Nov 25, 2013, 02:07 PM
Nov 2013

Coal is just the opposite. Rather than losing money they wouldn't otherwise lose... they're making money that they otherwise wouldn't make (if external costs were included).

How, exactly are you establishing the "actual value" you speak of?

Asked and answered. If you have to "dump" electricity for next to nothing (in some cases paying to have it taken away), yet you're forced to buy it at the same time... can't you see that that's only possible temporarily?

And to be on point, why don't you specifically address the point of Poland.

Because that isn't what I replied to?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»German renewables are inv...»Reply #18