Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Sacrificing the desert to save the Earth [View all]hunter
(40,698 posts)25. Not to mention the coal mines...

The crazy thing is we've already dug enough uranium and thorium out of the ground to power the USA for a long, long time.
The "waste" from our obsolete nuclear power plants is still 95% fuel. We've got a bunch of useless bombs in storage. We've got huge piles of mining wastes that contain thorium. We've got acres and acres of poisonous depleted uranium stored in corroding containers, more than we could ever hope to shoot at our enemies.

But the odds are very good we'll simply export these nuclear fuels to the nations that build reactors to use it. Meanwhile, we'll burn coal, frack natural gas, and make gasoline from tar sands at a much greater environmental cost.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
They aren't "sacrificing the desert" - the deserts are growing - because of global warming.
bananas
Feb 2012
#2
In the article it says that a land area as big as LA, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties
XemaSab
Feb 2012
#5
The historical Dust Bowl was due to a combination of drought and breaking up the topsoil
XemaSab
Feb 2012
#17
Hopelessly flailing against the very solution to the global warming problem still I see.
txlibdem
Feb 2012
#18
So we should destroy people's homes and livelihoods before relocating a turtle to another place?
txlibdem
Feb 2012
#33
It's too bad there aren't any big, flattish, unused, sunny surfaces in cities.
LeftyMom
Feb 2012
#35
That's why residents of those cities can put up solar panels... just don't bulldoze their homes
txlibdem
Feb 2012
#57
“…they represent but a pin prick compared to the scale of solar thermal plus solar PV that we need…”
OKIsItJustMe
Feb 2012
#54
The scale is massive, yes, but no more massive than other projects we have built
txlibdem
Feb 2012
#20
Yet even a small change to their environment will spell certain peril for their species
txlibdem
Feb 2012
#26
And how many square miles of land will be yielded uninhabitable by a solar accident?
OKIsItJustMe
Feb 2012
#27