Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)Ontario's power glut means possible nuclear plant shutdowns [View all]
Ontario's power glut means possible nuclear plant shutdowns
OTTAWA For at least eight hours Monday, Ontario is once again forecast to produce more electricity than it consumes, and the recurring glut has one top energy executive warning of temporary nuclear power plant shutdowns.
We have largely been able to avoid nuclear shutdowns to deal with the (surplus) conditions but this may not be the case in the near future, Paul Murphy, head of the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO), recently told an industry gathering.
His comment is raising questions about Ontarios plans to boost nuclear power as the provinces chief source of energy.
Nuclear-generated power supplies about 57 per cent of Ontarios electricity. Based on the provinces assumption that demand will grow moderately over the long term, multi-billion-dollar projects are contemplated for new reactors and refurbishments of existing ones.
The problem is, unlike wind...
OTTAWA For at least eight hours Monday, Ontario is once again forecast to produce more electricity than it consumes, and the recurring glut has one top energy executive warning of temporary nuclear power plant shutdowns.
We have largely been able to avoid nuclear shutdowns to deal with the (surplus) conditions but this may not be the case in the near future, Paul Murphy, head of the Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO), recently told an industry gathering.
His comment is raising questions about Ontarios plans to boost nuclear power as the provinces chief source of energy.
Nuclear-generated power supplies about 57 per cent of Ontarios electricity. Based on the provinces assumption that demand will grow moderately over the long term, multi-billion-dollar projects are contemplated for new reactors and refurbishments of existing ones.
The problem is, unlike wind...
http://www.vancouversun.com/technology/Ontario+power+glut+means+possible+nuclear+plant+shutdowns/6105634/story.html
The more renewables are installed the more this becomes an existential problem for coal and nuclear. They are forced to shut down more and more often, meaning that the amount of power they sell is reduced.
Fuel as a portion of their overhead is rather small,and the reduced sales lowers their income by more than it reduces their fuel costs; meaning they have a shortfall which has to be made up by charging more for the power they *are* able to sell.
This increase in cost, in turn, makes renewables more competitive leading to more capacity being installed.
A perfect descending spiral for both coal and nuclear unless governments step in to prop them up with artificially high prices on the electricity they produce.
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"...step in to prop them up with artificially high prices on the electricity they produce."
Dead_Parrot
Feb 2012
#2
If nuclear bad is so bad, why do its opponents need to engage in this type of activity??
FBaggins
Feb 2012
#6
So you are claiming that civilian nuclear reactors are not based on military research?
kristopher
Feb 2012
#7
Does a civilian reactor, or a military material prep reactor crank out a completed W88 warhead pit?
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2012
#8
Yes, I'm sure the Department of Energy doesn't know where the fuck this plant is.
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2012
#33
It is irrelevant since your assertion of fact in post #5 was, yet again, false.
kristopher
Feb 2012
#38
What competitive advantage does the liability cap give over alternative distribution systems?
kristopher
Feb 2012
#43
In order to be an "avoided" cost it first must be a cost that would otherwise be paid.
FBaggins
Feb 2012
#56
If your statement is true then why does the nuclear industry LOVE the Price Anderson Act?
kristopher
Feb 2012
#58
Perhaps the beer is why you don't grasp why you're wrong about the nature of the issue.
kristopher
Feb 2012
#26
The nuclear plants have to shut down because they can't sell their electricity
kristopher
Feb 2012
#36