Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
20. The same goes for that BS claim.
Tue Dec 3, 2013, 07:29 PM
Dec 2013

You made yoour remark responding to a post about $0.02/kwh so it's a reasonable inference that this was what triggered your post.
But your squirm is no better. No one made any such claim - although that is a favorite rightwing talking point.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Or HALF of ONE plant... FBaggins Nov 2013 #1
CORRECT!!! PamW Nov 2013 #2
It's what one expects from evangelists. GliderGuider Nov 2013 #3
Very true LouisvilleDem Nov 2013 #4
CORRECT!!! PamW Nov 2013 #6
We've heard similar predictions every two years for 50 years. NNadir Nov 2013 #5
No, we haven't. nt kristopher Dec 2013 #10
Numbers from National Academy of Science show 43GW of solar is significant kristopher Dec 2013 #7
YES!!!! EXACTLY as I stated... PamW Dec 2013 #8
Argue with someone else kristopher Dec 2013 #9
The answers were already posted... PamW Dec 2013 #11
"Solar at 2c/kWh? Not a matter of if, but when – and by whom" kristopher Dec 2013 #12
but guesses and hopes need to become reality backwoodsbob Dec 2013 #13
It is reality kristopher Dec 2013 #14
your snark aside backwoodsbob Dec 2013 #15
That is bullshit. kristopher Dec 2013 #16
no your full of it backwoodsbob Dec 2013 #17
It's their motto... PamW Dec 2013 #18
true backwoodsbob Dec 2013 #19
The same goes for that BS claim. kristopher Dec 2013 #20
so now I'm a RW'er to boot backwoodsbob Dec 2013 #21
It IS a standard right wing talking point kristopher Dec 2013 #22
WTH claim do you want me to give 5 cases of? backwoodsbob Dec 2013 #23
Ah, the backtracking starts... kristopher Dec 2013 #24
Are you referring to claims solar would be a major energy player? NickB79 Dec 2013 #25
A discussion of 'potential' is not a prediction kristopher Dec 2013 #26
kris splitting hairs between prediction and potential? NickB79 Dec 2013 #27
WTF are you talking about? kristopher Dec 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The US has 43 nuclear pow...»Reply #20