Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Der Spiegel: How German Electricity Became A Luxury Item. [View all]FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)9. How Much Global Warming Is Guaranteed Even If We Stopped Building Coal-Fired Power Plants Today?
How Much Global Warming Is Guaranteed Even If We Stopped Building Coal-Fired Power Plants Today?
Humanity has yet to reach the point of no return when it comes to catastrophic climate change, according to new calculations. If we content ourselves with the existing fossil-fuel infrastructure we can hold greenhouse gas concentrations below 450 parts per million in the atmosphere and limit warming to below 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levelsboth common benchmarks for international efforts to avoid the worst impacts of ongoing climate changeaccording to a new analysis in the September 10 issue of Science. The bad news is we are adding more fossil-fuel infrastructureoil-burning cars, coal-fired power plants, industrial factories consuming natural gasevery day.
A team of scientists analyzed the existing fossil-fuel infrastructure to determine how much greenhouse gas emissions we have committed to if all of that kit is utilized for its entire expected lifetime. The answer: an average of 496 billion metric tons more of carbon dioxide added to the atmosphere between now and 2060 in "committed emissions".
That assumes life spans of roughly 40 years for a coal-fired power plant and 17 years for a typical carpotentially major under- and overestimates, respectively, given that some coal-fired power plants still in use in the U.S. first fired up in the 1950s. Plugging that roughly 500 gigatonne number into a computer-generated climate model predicted CO2 levels would then peak at less than 430 ppm with an attendant warming of 1.3 degrees C above preindustrial average temperature. That's just 50 ppm higher than present levels and 150 ppm higher than preindustrial atmospheric concentrations.
Still, we are rapidly approaching a point of no return, cautions climate modeler Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution for Science's Department of Global Ecology at Stanford University, who participated in the study. "There is little doubt that more CO2-emitting devices will be built," the researchers wrote. After all, the study does not take into account all the enabling infrastructuresuch as highways, gas stations and refineriesthat contribute inertia that holds back significant changes to lower-emitting alternatives, such as electric cars.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=guaranteed-global-warming-with-existing-fossil-fuel-infrastructure
Humanity has yet to reach the point of no return when it comes to catastrophic climate change, according to new calculations. If we content ourselves with the existing fossil-fuel infrastructure we can hold greenhouse gas concentrations below 450 parts per million in the atmosphere and limit warming to below 2 degrees Celsius above preindustrial levelsboth common benchmarks for international efforts to avoid the worst impacts of ongoing climate changeaccording to a new analysis in the September 10 issue of Science. The bad news is we are adding more fossil-fuel infrastructureoil-burning cars, coal-fired power plants, industrial factories consuming natural gasevery day.
A team of scientists analyzed the existing fossil-fuel infrastructure to determine how much greenhouse gas emissions we have committed to if all of that kit is utilized for its entire expected lifetime. The answer: an average of 496 billion metric tons more of carbon dioxide added to the atmosphere between now and 2060 in "committed emissions".
That assumes life spans of roughly 40 years for a coal-fired power plant and 17 years for a typical carpotentially major under- and overestimates, respectively, given that some coal-fired power plants still in use in the U.S. first fired up in the 1950s. Plugging that roughly 500 gigatonne number into a computer-generated climate model predicted CO2 levels would then peak at less than 430 ppm with an attendant warming of 1.3 degrees C above preindustrial average temperature. That's just 50 ppm higher than present levels and 150 ppm higher than preindustrial atmospheric concentrations.
Still, we are rapidly approaching a point of no return, cautions climate modeler Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution for Science's Department of Global Ecology at Stanford University, who participated in the study. "There is little doubt that more CO2-emitting devices will be built," the researchers wrote. After all, the study does not take into account all the enabling infrastructuresuch as highways, gas stations and refineriesthat contribute inertia that holds back significant changes to lower-emitting alternatives, such as electric cars.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=guaranteed-global-warming-with-existing-fossil-fuel-infrastructure
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The opening statement is correct, the sarcasm afterwards may be addressed by noting...
NNadir
Dec 2013
#3
How Much Global Warming Is Guaranteed Even If We Stopped Building Coal-Fired Power Plants Today?
FreakinDJ
Dec 2013
#9
Meaning: the high speed and low cost of renewables is crucial to a transition from carbon.
kristopher
Dec 2013
#11
"Germany has the second highest electricity prices in Europe, after Denmark"
kristopher
Dec 2013
#18
Actually your evocation of "experts around the world," reminds me of Amory Lovin's 1976 "paper"...
NNadir
Dec 2013
#19
There isn't a single anti-nuke "solar will save us" maven who ever uses any word BUT "could..."
NNadir
Dec 2013
#21
Um...um...I really don't think that you are any more qualified to give grammar lessons than you...
NNadir
Dec 2013
#33