Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,120 posts)
12. Thank you for offering another opinion on a subject you know nothing about.
Sun Dec 8, 2013, 09:01 PM
Dec 2013

The subject in this question is my ethical universe.

For the record, as I have made clear many times, I was once a dumb, uneducated anti-nuke, but I changed my mind.

I did so after Chernobyl blew up - leaving my heart in my throat - and to my surprise, after believing the horseshit handed to me over the years by shit for brains people, like say, the membership of the Union of Concerned "Scientists," millions of people failed to die.

Now, I do recognize that bourgeois brats who spend their days with stupid daydreams about the Tesla electric car for billionaires and millionaires, etc, live in an ethical universe populated by other people who think that the only reason to do something is for money, but I remain unimpressed - well that may be too wimpy a word, "unimpressed" - perhaps I should say "I hold this view in contempt.

Jim Hansen, for one example, did not start his career to promote nuclear energy. Neither did Richard Leakey. Both of these men, to list only a few well known examples inhabit a moral universe.

Now, if I thought that the anti-nukes here inhabited such a universe, I might have more respect for them. I mean, there is a Catholic Charity that's trying to buy poor people in Germany compact fluorescent bulbs, and maybe even LED's because the price of electricity is so high in that country because of the activities of rich clueless kids who make up the so called "Green" Party in that coal burning hell hole. You would think they might donate a few bucks to the charity, or, if they object to Catholicism, a similar charity. But I don't expect any ethical understanding at all from these kinds of people. They are all, from what I can tell, materialist consumers obsessed with verifying, no matter who suffers, their dim bulb view of the universe. What I expect from them is what I see: Morally and technically oblivious posts about how $107,500 electric BMWs will save the world.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1127&pid=58407

Have a wonderful week.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The ONLY answer is more nuclear power. Wilms Dec 2013 #1
The opening statement is correct, the sarcasm afterwards may be addressed by noting... NNadir Dec 2013 #3
How Much Global Warming Is Guaranteed Even If We Stopped Building Coal-Fired Power Plants Today? FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #9
I see two major errors with that study NickB79 Dec 2013 #13
Still trying to greenwash the behavior of the megaCorps, eh? kristopher Dec 2013 #2
Thank you for quoting the fool investment websites. I'm, um, unimpressed. NNadir Dec 2013 #6
Your concern is *exclusively* with the nuclear industry. kristopher Dec 2013 #8
27% Reduction in World Crop Yeilds due to Global Warming by 2050 FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #10
Meaning: the high speed and low cost of renewables is crucial to a transition from carbon. kristopher Dec 2013 #11
Thank you for offering another opinion on a subject you know nothing about. NNadir Dec 2013 #12
Energy storage will be the determining marsis Dec 2013 #4
Not really. Current research and experience have altered our understanding kristopher Dec 2013 #7
Thanks marsis Dec 2013 #17
It would be an economic decision, here are some references. kristopher Dec 2013 #30
This is a trend that is world wide. The old technologies cannot tsuki Dec 2013 #5
Kick... hunter Dec 2013 #14
What do you think of Canada Free Press? kristopher Dec 2013 #15
If one lives by googling and cut and paste sound bites... NNadir Dec 2013 #16
"Germany has the second highest electricity prices in Europe, after Denmark" kristopher Dec 2013 #18
Actually your evocation of "experts around the world," reminds me of Amory Lovin's 1976 "paper"... NNadir Dec 2013 #19
There you go again. kristopher Dec 2013 #20
There isn't a single anti-nuke "solar will save us" maven who ever uses any word BUT "could..." NNadir Dec 2013 #21
So your claim is that nuclear WILL save us? kristopher Dec 2013 #22
Um...um...I really don't think that you are any more qualified to give grammar lessons than you... NNadir Dec 2013 #33
Did you even bother to look at the publication date? Iterate Dec 2013 #23
“dispossessed”? There is no involuntary homelessness in Germany. Iterate Dec 2013 #24
If German electricity was priced by the usual market methods, Iterate Dec 2013 #25
Graphing German household energy costs kristopher Dec 2013 #29
We could parse the article word-by-word, number-by-number, Iterate Dec 2013 #32
yikes gopiscrap Dec 2013 #26
Lastly, when you fling insults like that Iterate Dec 2013 #27
My, my, my, this is an elaborate series of proofs that all of the poor people in... NNadir Dec 2013 #28
"Have a nice evening" kristopher Dec 2013 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Der Spiegel: How German ...»Reply #12