Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(38,139 posts)
33. Um...um...I really don't think that you are any more qualified to give grammar lessons than you...
Wed Dec 11, 2013, 11:48 PM
Dec 2013

than you were qualified to give lessons in any of the other subjects you prattle on about.

One hopes that you are not teaching anyone anything, especially children.

As for soothsaying, I don't believe that nuclear energy will save very much at this point. Fear and ignorance have won, clearly.

Nuclear energy will be prevented - and has been prevented - from saving what it might have saved, and all humanity is suffering as a result.

The insipid and the uneducated have triumphed again, although I do note that there have been people here, on this website, who have made thousands of predictions, never supported by demonstration, over the last ten years that solar and wind energy will save the world.

In fact, during the period that these people have been posting these quasi-religious tracts, the ten years I've been here, about 300 billion tons of dangerous fossil fuel waste was dumped into the atmosphere. From the recent Lancet figures, roughly 60 million people died from air pollution.

And what do we have in response to this tragedy, a grammar lesson on "conditional statements" from someone who has trouble working a keyboard honestly?

The mindless faith based "renewables will save us set" continuously post conditional statements like this rather odious one, http://journals.democraticunderground.com/kristopher/739

This one comes slightly less than four decades after Amory Lovins, dangerous fossil fuel greenwasher, told the world that the United States could produce 16 quads of solar energy by 2000.

The entire world doesn't produce one quad (or exajoule) of solar electricity in 2013. Not one.

Five years ago, on this site, someone told us that the whole would could survive on renewable energy, but five years later, after sucking hundreds of billions of dollars, euros, trillions of yen and yuan, the entire wind and solar industry combined don't produce 1% of the 540 exajoules of energy humanity now consumes.

In the five years after this bit of toxic wishful thinking:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4666449

...was published, 30 million people died from air pollution, and the concentration of dangerous fossil fuel waste in the planetary atmosphere increased by more than 10 ppm. During the week of December 17, 2008, when this bit of crystal ball horseshit about the grand expensive money sucking so called "renewable energy" scam saving the world was published, the concentration of the dangerous fossil fuel waste in the planetary atmosphere was recorded at 385.55 ppm.

http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/weekly.html

The most recent figure, as of this writing, comes in at 396.28 ppm. That's just 5 years, more than 10 ppm.

Look who's complaining about soothsaying!

You won, by the way. Fear and ignorance have a measurable result, recorded, for all of humanity to regret, in the numbers out of Mauna Loa.

Congratulations. You must be very, very, very, very, very, very, very, very proud.

Have a nice day tomorrow.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The ONLY answer is more nuclear power. Wilms Dec 2013 #1
The opening statement is correct, the sarcasm afterwards may be addressed by noting... NNadir Dec 2013 #3
How Much Global Warming Is Guaranteed Even If We Stopped Building Coal-Fired Power Plants Today? FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #9
I see two major errors with that study NickB79 Dec 2013 #13
Still trying to greenwash the behavior of the megaCorps, eh? kristopher Dec 2013 #2
Thank you for quoting the fool investment websites. I'm, um, unimpressed. NNadir Dec 2013 #6
Your concern is *exclusively* with the nuclear industry. kristopher Dec 2013 #8
27% Reduction in World Crop Yeilds due to Global Warming by 2050 FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #10
Meaning: the high speed and low cost of renewables is crucial to a transition from carbon. kristopher Dec 2013 #11
Thank you for offering another opinion on a subject you know nothing about. NNadir Dec 2013 #12
Energy storage will be the determining marsis Dec 2013 #4
Not really. Current research and experience have altered our understanding kristopher Dec 2013 #7
Thanks marsis Dec 2013 #17
It would be an economic decision, here are some references. kristopher Dec 2013 #30
This is a trend that is world wide. The old technologies cannot tsuki Dec 2013 #5
Kick... hunter Dec 2013 #14
What do you think of Canada Free Press? kristopher Dec 2013 #15
If one lives by googling and cut and paste sound bites... NNadir Dec 2013 #16
"Germany has the second highest electricity prices in Europe, after Denmark" kristopher Dec 2013 #18
Actually your evocation of "experts around the world," reminds me of Amory Lovin's 1976 "paper"... NNadir Dec 2013 #19
There you go again. kristopher Dec 2013 #20
There isn't a single anti-nuke "solar will save us" maven who ever uses any word BUT "could..." NNadir Dec 2013 #21
So your claim is that nuclear WILL save us? kristopher Dec 2013 #22
Um...um...I really don't think that you are any more qualified to give grammar lessons than you... NNadir Dec 2013 #33
Did you even bother to look at the publication date? Iterate Dec 2013 #23
“dispossessed”? There is no involuntary homelessness in Germany. Iterate Dec 2013 #24
If German electricity was priced by the usual market methods, Iterate Dec 2013 #25
Graphing German household energy costs kristopher Dec 2013 #29
We could parse the article word-by-word, number-by-number, Iterate Dec 2013 #32
yikes gopiscrap Dec 2013 #26
Lastly, when you fling insults like that Iterate Dec 2013 #27
My, my, my, this is an elaborate series of proofs that all of the poor people in... NNadir Dec 2013 #28
"Have a nice evening" kristopher Dec 2013 #31
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Der Spiegel: How German ...»Reply #33