Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

PamW

(1,825 posts)

14. DU is fortunate...

Reply to madokie (Reply #13)

Fri Dec 13, 2013, 08:43 PM

Dec 2013

In science, or any other objective field of knowledge, facts are NOT decided by a vote.

There is the story about Albert Einstein who was once told that there were 12 other scientists that could prove that he was wrong about the Theory of Relativity. Einstein remarked, "Why 12? If the argument is any good; all it takes is ONE."

When it comes to knowledge of science, and the nuclear field in particular, DU is graced with TWO people who know what they are talking about.

The rest; not so much.

The good thing about science is that it is true, whether or not you believe in it.
--Neil deGrasse Tyson

PamW

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WashPost infographic on recent thefts of nuclear materials [View all] kristopher Dec 2013 OP

The vast majority of MEDICAL sources PamW Dec 2013 #1

Even if what you say were true (and given your track record that's a Grand Canyon sized if) kristopher Dec 2013 #2

Evidently the logic went over kristopher's head... PamW Dec 2013 #3

Was that supposed to make sense? FBaggins Dec 2013 #4

Is someone advocating for a massive expansion of reactors for medical use? kristopher Dec 2013 #5

Did you just miss the point... or was that an intentional dodge? FBaggins Dec 2013 #6

"How does the theft/loss of material that has nothing to do with the number of reactors" kristopher Dec 2013 #7

Dodging again? FBaggins Dec 2013 #8

Your quoted statement is pure bullshit. kristopher Dec 2013 #9

Are you going to dodge all day? FBaggins Dec 2013 #11

FBaggins is CORRECT, and kristopher is 100% WRONG!!! PamW Dec 2013 #12

You are just digging yourself deeper and deeper ..... oldhippie Dec 2013 #19

WHO is playing fast and loose with the facts????? PamW Dec 2013 #10

"READ the article. The items that were stolen were SOURCES." kristopher Dec 2013 #24

NOPE!!! PamW Dec 2013 #26

Your vast ignorance of nuclear technology is obviated here. NNadir Dec 2013 #22

Pretty sobering isn't it? madokie Dec 2013 #13

DU is fortunate... PamW Dec 2013 #14

Yes it is. kristopher Dec 2013 #15

Oppenheimer quote about radioisotopes... PamW Dec 2013 #16

The list of lost and stolen material is not limited as you are claiming. kristopher Dec 2013 #18

Because I said so!! PamW Dec 2013 #20

Existing and aspiring nuclear power states kristopher Dec 2013 #17

"..at least I won't be unoriginal." PamW Dec 2013 #21

That's a presentation by John Holdren, one of the MIT 2003 nuclear study authors kristopher Dec 2013 #23

DOES NOT MATTER!!! PamW Dec 2013 #25

Less Well Known Cases of Nuclear Terrorism and Nuclear Diversion in Russia kristopher Dec 2013 #27