Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(37,816 posts)
22. Your vast ignorance of nuclear technology is obviated here.
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 01:51 PM
Dec 2013

Nuclear power saves lives, and nuclear medicine saves lives as well.

Apparently, your radiation paranoia extends to medical uses as well.

By contrast, ignorance kills people, and there are no critics of nuclear technology on this website who are anything but ignorant. There is not one who understands for instance that Cobalt-60 and Iodine-125 (the latter of which I have worked with extensively) are both prepared in accelerators, have nothing to do with nuclear power, and are prepared exclusively for the purpose of saving human lives.

According to dumb guys whining over the more than half a century of nuclear power operations, including the gas and oil flake Amory Lovins, the theft of nuclear materials was supposed to end in all kinds of nuclear wars.

http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/33962/amory-b-lovins-l-hunter-lovins-and-leonard-ross/nuclear-power-and-nuclear-bombs

Being a dumb anti-nuke now working for dangerous fossil fuel companies and collecting oodles of money from them, he reported in 1980, in the above linked festival of fear and ignorance that nuclear power was dying and it was a good thing, because if it wasn't dead, the result would be nuclear war.

Since 1980, nuclear power production on this planet increased 400%, and the number of nuclear wars observed is zero. The number of oil wars fought on behalf of the companies that Amory Lovins greenwashs is not zero.

Since 1980, 0.7 trillion metric tons of dangerous fossil fuel waste have been dumped into the planetary atmosphere by people and companies like the one Amory Lovins, idiot anti-nuke, works for.

http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/iedindex3.cfm?tid=90&pid=44&aid=8&cid=regions&syid=1980&eyid=2011&unit=MMTCD

The concentration of dangerous fossil fuel waste in the planetary atmosphere - destroyed in large part by the mindless paranoid excesses of the Lovins crowd - has risen more than 50 ppm.

ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/products/trends/co2/co2_mm_mlo.txt

Close to 100 million people died from air pollution in this period.

And what do we have here?

A cut and paste piece of garbage trying to kill people with fear and ignorance by appealing to cases that have killed no one.

For this grand tragedy can any of the anti-nuke paranoids identify as many deaths as will take place in the next hour from air pollution? The next ten minutes? The next sixty seconds? One death?

Humanity deserves what it's going to get because there are a subset of very, very, very, very, very ignorant people who for reasons that remain mysterious, have been taken seriously although there is no rational reason to do so.

Famous Anti-nuke Amory Lovins describes his revenue sources:

Mr. Lovins’s other clients have included Accenture, Allstate, AMD, Anglo American, Anheuser-Busch, Bank of America, Baxter, Borg-Warner, BP, HP Bulmer, Carrier, Chevron, Ciba-Geigy, CLSA, ConocoPhillips, Corning, Dow, Equitable, GM, HP, Invensys, Lockheed Martin, Mitsubishi, Monsanto, Motorola, Norsk Hydro, Petrobras, Prudential, Rio Tinto, Royal Dutch/Shell, Shearson Lehman Amex, STMicroelectronics, Sun Oil, Suncor, Texas Instruments, UBS, Unilever, Westinghouse, Xerox, major developers, and over 100 energy utilities. His public-sector clients have included the OECD, the UN, and RFF; the Australian, Canadian, Dutch, German, and Italian governments; 13 states; Congress, and the U.S. Energy and Defense Departments.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The vast majority of MEDICAL sources PamW Dec 2013 #1
Even if what you say were true (and given your track record that's a Grand Canyon sized if) kristopher Dec 2013 #2
Evidently the logic went over kristopher's head... PamW Dec 2013 #3
Was that supposed to make sense? FBaggins Dec 2013 #4
Is someone advocating for a massive expansion of reactors for medical use? kristopher Dec 2013 #5
Did you just miss the point... or was that an intentional dodge? FBaggins Dec 2013 #6
"How does the theft/loss of material that has nothing to do with the number of reactors" kristopher Dec 2013 #7
Dodging again? FBaggins Dec 2013 #8
Your quoted statement is pure bullshit. kristopher Dec 2013 #9
Are you going to dodge all day? FBaggins Dec 2013 #11
FBaggins is CORRECT, and kristopher is 100% WRONG!!! PamW Dec 2013 #12
You are just digging yourself deeper and deeper ..... oldhippie Dec 2013 #19
WHO is playing fast and loose with the facts????? PamW Dec 2013 #10
"READ the article. The items that were stolen were SOURCES." kristopher Dec 2013 #24
NOPE!!! PamW Dec 2013 #26
Your vast ignorance of nuclear technology is obviated here. NNadir Dec 2013 #22
Pretty sobering isn't it? madokie Dec 2013 #13
DU is fortunate... PamW Dec 2013 #14
Yes it is. kristopher Dec 2013 #15
Oppenheimer quote about radioisotopes... PamW Dec 2013 #16
The list of lost and stolen material is not limited as you are claiming. kristopher Dec 2013 #18
Because I said so!! PamW Dec 2013 #20
Existing and aspiring nuclear power states kristopher Dec 2013 #17
"..at least I won't be unoriginal." PamW Dec 2013 #21
That's a presentation by John Holdren, one of the MIT 2003 nuclear study authors kristopher Dec 2013 #23
DOES NOT MATTER!!! PamW Dec 2013 #25
Less Well Known Cases of Nuclear Terrorism and Nuclear Diversion in Russia kristopher Dec 2013 #27
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»WashPost infographic on r...»Reply #22