Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
23. That's a presentation by John Holdren, one of the MIT 2003 nuclear study authors
Sat Dec 14, 2013, 03:35 PM
Dec 2013

Dr. John P. Holdren is Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). Prior to joining the Obama administration Dr. Holdren was Teresa and John Heinz Professor of Environmental Policy and Director of the Program on Science, Technology, and Public Policy at Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government, as well as professor in Harvard's Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Director of the independent, nonprofit Woods Hole Research Center. Previously he was on the faculty of the University of California, Berkeley, where he co-founded in 1973 and co-led until 1996 the interdisciplinary graduate-degree program in energy and resources. During the Clinton administration Dr. Holdren served as a member of PCAST through both terms and in that capacity chaired studies requested by President Clinton on preventing theft of nuclear materials, disposition of surplus weapon plutonium, the prospects of fusion energy, U.S. energy R&D strategy, and international cooperation on energy-technology innovation.

Dr. Holdren holds advanced degrees in aerospace engineering and theoretical plasma physics from MIT and Stanford. He is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, as well as a foreign member of the Royal Society of London and former president of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He served as a member of the MacArthur Foundation’s Board of Trustees from 1991 to 2005, as Chair of the National Academy of Sciences Committee on International Security and Arms Control from 1994 to 2005, and as Co-Chair of the independent, bipartisan National Commission on Energy Policy from 2002 to 2009. His awards include a MacArthur Foundation Prize Fellowship, the John Heinz Prize in Public Policy, the Tyler Prize for Environmental Achievement, and the Volvo Environment Prize. In December 1995 he gave the acceptance lecture for the Nobel Peace Prize on behalf of the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs, an international organization of scientists and public figures in which he held leadership positions from 1982 to 1997.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The vast majority of MEDICAL sources PamW Dec 2013 #1
Even if what you say were true (and given your track record that's a Grand Canyon sized if) kristopher Dec 2013 #2
Evidently the logic went over kristopher's head... PamW Dec 2013 #3
Was that supposed to make sense? FBaggins Dec 2013 #4
Is someone advocating for a massive expansion of reactors for medical use? kristopher Dec 2013 #5
Did you just miss the point... or was that an intentional dodge? FBaggins Dec 2013 #6
"How does the theft/loss of material that has nothing to do with the number of reactors" kristopher Dec 2013 #7
Dodging again? FBaggins Dec 2013 #8
Your quoted statement is pure bullshit. kristopher Dec 2013 #9
Are you going to dodge all day? FBaggins Dec 2013 #11
FBaggins is CORRECT, and kristopher is 100% WRONG!!! PamW Dec 2013 #12
You are just digging yourself deeper and deeper ..... oldhippie Dec 2013 #19
WHO is playing fast and loose with the facts????? PamW Dec 2013 #10
"READ the article. The items that were stolen were SOURCES." kristopher Dec 2013 #24
NOPE!!! PamW Dec 2013 #26
Your vast ignorance of nuclear technology is obviated here. NNadir Dec 2013 #22
Pretty sobering isn't it? madokie Dec 2013 #13
DU is fortunate... PamW Dec 2013 #14
Yes it is. kristopher Dec 2013 #15
Oppenheimer quote about radioisotopes... PamW Dec 2013 #16
The list of lost and stolen material is not limited as you are claiming. kristopher Dec 2013 #18
Because I said so!! PamW Dec 2013 #20
Existing and aspiring nuclear power states kristopher Dec 2013 #17
"..at least I won't be unoriginal." PamW Dec 2013 #21
That's a presentation by John Holdren, one of the MIT 2003 nuclear study authors kristopher Dec 2013 #23
DOES NOT MATTER!!! PamW Dec 2013 #25
Less Well Known Cases of Nuclear Terrorism and Nuclear Diversion in Russia kristopher Dec 2013 #27
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»WashPost infographic on r...»Reply #23