Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(37,943 posts)
57. Really? Besides being an expert on lawyered up fantasy epidemiology...
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 10:04 PM
Dec 2013

...you now feel qualified to announce that all liberals are anti-nukes.

One can never be too shocked at what dribbles out of the mouths of anti-nukes, who spend their days trying to prove that someone, anyone, died from Fukushima, so as to justify all the oil, coal and gas they've burned to prove the not provable point.

As for humanism and decency, two things defining the liberal viewpoint:

Each person of course, makes his or her own judgments of what qualifies as decency. For me, decency was always represented by the 25th article of the Declaration of Human Rights, written by Eleanor Roosevelt and approved by the United Nations in 1948, albeit, regrettably, being honored more in breach than in practice.

It reads as follows:

(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.


Now, I would wager that someone who has pushed, in service of fear and ignorance, to double the electricity rates in Germany isn't actually working to provide a right to a standard of living adequate to health and well being, at least not for poor people.

...Neither is an oblivious fool of the type who, on a planet where more than 2 billion people have never operated a flush toilet, keeps pushing the world to spend hundreds of billions of euros, hundreds of billions of dollars, trillions of yen and yuan on a faith based solar scheme that can't even produce one exajoule of the 538 exajoules humanity consumed in 2011 (with a higher amount) almost certainly being consumed in 2013...

...we won't even comment about the people living in low lying areas facing the effects of climate change...

...or the more than 3 million people who die each year from indoor air pollution as a result of using "renewable biomass..."

If I were you, I'd stick to hawking $137,500 BMW i8 sports cars for millionaires and billionaires.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/112758407

You know as much about liberalism, especially as defined in Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as you know about energy and epidemiology, which is not much.

For the record, the inventors of nuclear reactors, men like Fermi, Wigner, Weinberg, Dyson were mostly liberals, all of them smarter - infinitely so - than the little dogmatic scientifically illiterate anti-nukes who populate this space. There is not one anti-nuke on this website who could pass a college level physics course, zero, zip.

Thanks for the comment and for contributing to this festival of fear and ignorance. If nothing else, you're consistent, which would be amusing were it not so dire.

Have a nice evening.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

OMG. Th1onein Dec 2013 #1
This is horrible.. samrock Dec 2013 #2
Wouldn't a nuclear powered aircraft carrier have radiation monitors... Make7 Dec 2013 #3
Of course FBaggins Dec 2013 #5
You would think that they would... Blanks Dec 2013 #6
Not everyone wears a TLD badge on board a carrier MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #17
Distillation should have solved the problem PamW Dec 2013 #23
I assumed that they didn't remove all particles. Blanks Dec 2013 #24
Apparently the USS Ronald Reagan doesn't use distillation, it uses reverse osmosis bananas Dec 2013 #25
Reversed osmosis is a preferred method for removing radioactive material from drinking water idwiyo Dec 2013 #26
It's not 100% effective, radioactive contaminants will still get through bananas Dec 2013 #37
Which makes the timeline all the more suspicious NickB79 Dec 2013 #39
All that is needed now is some idea what level of radioactivity was present in sea water, idwiyo Dec 2013 #42
EXACTLY!!! PamW Dec 2013 #46
What about the air they were breathing and the water they were immersed in? kristopher Dec 2013 #56
If you re-read this particular thread again, you might notice it does not discuss idwiyo Dec 2013 #59
The water filtering system is still a red herring kristopher Dec 2013 #62
Close... but no cigar. FBaggins Dec 2013 #69
Another Baggins pronuclear fantasy kristopher Dec 2013 #73
Was there anything in there that was even a little on-topic? FBaggins Dec 2013 #76
Yes, it is character assassination. kristopher Dec 2013 #78
Dead wrong. FBaggins Dec 2013 #79
Then you have evidence. Produce it. kristopher Dec 2013 #81
See 82. FBaggins Dec 2013 #83
I wonder how long it would take... Blanks Dec 2013 #34
The sailors were told to stop using desalinated water because it was contaminated bananas Dec 2013 #89
That's how the sailors know they were exposed to radiation bananas Dec 2013 #11
It sounds like he ate before washing his hands. kristopher Dec 2013 #19
thanks for this link, I'm a little uneasy about sharing the turner news network with anybody.. Voice for Peace Dec 2013 #29
Some older links, if you haven't seen them. bananas Dec 2013 #31
The non-ruling class are expendable. We're pawns in the elites' games. nt valerief Dec 2013 #4
It seems like the link is broken. FarPoint Dec 2013 #7
Here's a different link bananas Dec 2013 #8
Partial transcript bananas Dec 2013 #9
It's working for me. kristopher Dec 2013 #10
The link in the OP works for me. nt bananas Dec 2013 #12
Even if the link doesn't work... Blanks Dec 2013 #22
FYI FarPoint Dec 2013 #32
Use the nuclear-news.net link bananas Dec 2013 #36
Done. FarPoint Dec 2013 #38
It's been picked up by Al Jazeera bananas Dec 2013 #61
New info from Al Jazeera - several sailors don't have their participation in their medical records bananas Dec 2013 #72
I've got it posted on my Facebook wall... FarPoint Dec 2013 #86
"it’s only been 3 years since they went in." NickB79 Dec 2013 #13
Dubious Source ninjanurse Dec 2013 #14
I think the original source is in post #8, which is not a right-wing source. bananas Dec 2013 #21
Why do soo many people here penndragon69 Dec 2013 #15
A number of nuclear energy proponents frequent this space kristopher Dec 2013 #20
Because the science doesn't seem to support it NickB79 Dec 2013 #40
Fifty-one out of 5680? jmowreader Dec 2013 #16
Believe it or not MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #18
whoever is keeping everything clean, or working on maintenance, Voice for Peace Dec 2013 #28
Yes. And they been doing it for almost 100 years now MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #33
yah, personally I would expect it to be the radiation. Voice for Peace Dec 2013 #35
Yet they missed a faulty water purification system? NickB79 Dec 2013 #41
I am sure those systems are automated MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #43
Mother Nature's Radioactivity PamW Dec 2013 #45
Ha MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #47
Take another look at the image you posted FBaggins Dec 2013 #48
I didn't say i thought or say it was anything. MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #49
I am very curious why you posted some "scary" looking chart instead of idwiyo Dec 2013 #51
Just to illustrate your point: idwiyo Dec 2013 #52
Is anybody here knowledgeable about the Turner Radio Network? Voice for Peace Dec 2013 #27
I am not surprised. Sad, but not surprised. nt MADem Dec 2013 #30
Manual of Naval Preventive Medicine: Chapter 6 Water Supply Afloat kristopher Dec 2013 #44
Wow. And I assume therefore that everyone in Japan has brain tumors, luekemia and... NNadir Dec 2013 #54
I suppose you have me there... kristopher Dec 2013 #55
Really? Besides being an expert on lawyered up fantasy epidemiology... NNadir Dec 2013 #57
Deploying electric vehicles is a key element in reducing carbon emissions. kristopher Dec 2013 #58
Really? Climate change is all about cars for billionaires and millionaires? NNadir Dec 2013 #85
Please delete the holocaust denying/white nationalist link in the OP and use another muriel_volestrangler Dec 2013 #50
+1. n/t Laelth Dec 2013 #53
+2 Thank you. Didn't bother to even look at this link, but after seeing your post I did. idwiyo Dec 2013 #60
The story is accurate kristopher Dec 2013 #63
Great, delete that despicable link and replace it with a legitimate source. idwiyo Dec 2013 #64
Despicable link? kristopher Dec 2013 #65
Please, do elaborate about my efforts to "misdirect readers ". Explanation about efficency of RO idwiyo Dec 2013 #66
You're right. kristopher Dec 2013 #67
Accepted :) Was just really surprised. We are all human, and I get very passionate too idwiyo Dec 2013 #68
I already have muriel_volestrangler Dec 2013 #70
Exactly some people, including me, haven't read it. kristopher Dec 2013 #74
Depends on what you're calling "the story". FBaggins Dec 2013 #71
You are in no position to make that declaration. kristopher Dec 2013 #75
Actually... I am. FBaggins Dec 2013 #77
And I spent 8 years in command and control kristopher Dec 2013 #80
I have plenty of evidence... and I pointed you at it. FBaggins Dec 2013 #82
Getting washed to remove radioactive contamination. kristopher Dec 2013 #84
Don't you think you would have more credibility... FBaggins Dec 2013 #87
100% WRONG!! AGAIN!! PamW Dec 2013 #88
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»51 Sailors from USS Ronal...»Reply #57