Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
58. Deploying electric vehicles is a key element in reducing carbon emissions.
Mon Dec 16, 2013, 10:38 PM
Dec 2013

This is how you betray your true intentions. It isn't important to you that the more than 80% of carbon emissions from the personal transportation sector accounts for more than 3X the carbon than your entire nuclear fleet displaces. So when you deride the most promising solution to eliminating those emissions to take cheap shots, what does that say about your real agenda?

In addition to the potential emissions savings in the transportation sector, moving to electric vehicles dramatically decreases the costs of revamping the electric sector by integrating massive storage and demand response capabilities into the emerging systems of distributed renewable generation.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/112758909

Your faux concern for the poor and underprivileged also appears to be self serving. It is incongruent with the everything we know and contradicts the movements that you are co-opt as a source of moral authority.

Public document

Policy Brief #2: Recommendations on Energy for the UN General Assembly Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals (OWG on SDGs)

The recommendations on energy presented here have been compiled from three civil society consultations conducted by UN-NGLS from 2012-2013: a teleconference-based consultation that resulted in the report Advancing Regional Recommendations on the Post-2015 Agenda; an online consultation on four post-2015 reports to the Secretary-General; and a teleconference and meeting-based consultation on the UN Secretary-General’s Sustainable Energy for All Initiative. This brief also draws on the Women’s Major Group energy recommendations for the OWG on SDGs.

Civil society organizations (CSOs) recognize that several sets of proposed Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have included a goal on energy, often incorporating the three targets used by the Sustainable Energy for All Initiative:
a) ensuring universal access to modern energy services;
b) doubling the global rate of improvement in energy efficiency; and
c) doubling the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix.

Among CSOs, there is widespread support for including a goal on energy in the post-2015 sustainable development agenda. The significant majority of organizations, however, are not satisfied with the proposed goals so far, and advocate for more comprehensive, specific and ambitious targets. Consistent with the prevailing call from CSOs for the post-2015 development agenda to take a human rights-based approach, consultation participants asserted that all energy policy and implementation by the private and public sector must be consistent with existing UN human rights commitments. CSOs resoundingly called for energy targets to include a strong focus on reducing emissions and excessive energy use in the industrialized world. They further advocated that governments must promote development and energy generation that does not result in dangerous by-products, particularly those with the capacity to trigger global-level destruction. Detailed recommendations are presented below, organized according to the following five objectives:
1. Achieving universal energy access;
2. Ensuring clean, safe, and locally appropriate energy generation;
3. Advancing energy efficiency;
4. Enabling effective financing for energy; and
5. Establishing the roles of stakeholders.


1. Achieving Universal Energy Access

a) Address energy access as a common good to be provided as a public service.
b) Agree to a global energy access standard that incorporates civil society definitions of energy access and sustainability, such as Practical Action’s Total Energy Access Standards.
c) Design impact metrics that measure social and economic benefits of energy access, using a participatory approach. Measure progress at least by the number of people able to access energy services that meet or exceed a minimum agreed international standard for lighting, cooking, heating, cooling, and communications.
d) Prioritize access to free energy for the energy-deprived, and modernization of traditionally free and local energy sources. Reduce energy waste to support affordability and maximize availability, through measures such as retrofits to homes and businesses. Affordability must be the fundamental consideration in delivering sustainable energy access.
e) Centre energy access strategies and implementation on equity. Mainstream gender issues and women’s empowerment in discussions about sustainable energy and reducing poverty.
f) Ensure energy access and control over energy choices for people living in poverty, in line with the principle of energy sovereignty. Link the term “sustainable energy” to peoples’ capacity to design, manage, operate, and maintain energy facilities. Fund and support local capacity building to enable the achievement of energy objectives.
g) Promote regional energy access project incubators; build cooperatives to increase impacts of energy projects.
h) Use a variety of efficient energy sources, equipment and appliances at a variety of scales, as the traditional power sector alone will not and cannot deliver an end to energy poverty. On-, off- and mini- grid approaches, and a variety of cooking and mechanical power options, will be required to create universal energy access. 55% of the new generating capacity created over the coming years will need to be mini-grid or off-grid if the goal of universal access is to be achieved by 2030.1
i) Implement climate resilient energy sources to meet the goal of universal access. According to International Energy Agency reports, this will require off-grid renewable solutions.

j) As appropriate, adapt and innovate existing energy solutions to respond to new contexts. Effective business strategies of many “socially-oriented energy enterprises, organizations and financiers that understand the energy needs of low-income consumers in developing countries” are described in the World Resources Institute (WRI) report Implementation Strategies for Renewable Energy Services in Low-Income, Rural Areas.
k) To scale up energy service delivery, implement predictable, supportive and consistent government policy and regulation that prioritizes or incentivizes energy access.
l) Avoid nuclear energy in plans for energy access. Particularly in developing countries, nuclear energy is an impractical and dangerous choice due to its excessive and growing upfront costs; inability to compete with more cost-effective, fuel-free energy sources (wind and solar) and demand- reduction/management strategies; long construction periods (see 2.f below); poor economic performance in terms of cost per job created; legacy costs for management of radioactive waste (hazardous for millennia), decommissioning and environmental remediation; and security costs including protection against nuclear proliferation risk. In addition, the economic impact of nuclear accidents – overwhelming even for the advanced industrial nations – would easily outstretch the economic and technical capacity of most nations. Nuclear generation supply is declining in nearly all nations where the industry is most advanced,2 and recent attempts to revive it have failed primarily due to economic factors. Other environmental trends resulting from climate change – such as surface water warming, drought, and sea-level rise – will exacerbate this trend in the coming years by reducing the generation capacity, reliability, and revenues of nuclear units, while raising their operating costs. Countries building new nuclear reactors are disregarding the economic and safety liabilities. Small modular nuclear reactors must not be promoted as a form of distributed generation as “vendors are cutting corners on important reactor safety features, such as containment structures,” to save capital costs, and any generic defects in mass-produced modular units would spread throughout the entire reactor fleet.3


Lots more - download full text: http://www.nirs.org/alternatives/unnlgsbriefforowgenergynov2013.pdf

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

OMG. Th1onein Dec 2013 #1
This is horrible.. samrock Dec 2013 #2
Wouldn't a nuclear powered aircraft carrier have radiation monitors... Make7 Dec 2013 #3
Of course FBaggins Dec 2013 #5
You would think that they would... Blanks Dec 2013 #6
Not everyone wears a TLD badge on board a carrier MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #17
Distillation should have solved the problem PamW Dec 2013 #23
I assumed that they didn't remove all particles. Blanks Dec 2013 #24
Apparently the USS Ronald Reagan doesn't use distillation, it uses reverse osmosis bananas Dec 2013 #25
Reversed osmosis is a preferred method for removing radioactive material from drinking water idwiyo Dec 2013 #26
It's not 100% effective, radioactive contaminants will still get through bananas Dec 2013 #37
Which makes the timeline all the more suspicious NickB79 Dec 2013 #39
All that is needed now is some idea what level of radioactivity was present in sea water, idwiyo Dec 2013 #42
EXACTLY!!! PamW Dec 2013 #46
What about the air they were breathing and the water they were immersed in? kristopher Dec 2013 #56
If you re-read this particular thread again, you might notice it does not discuss idwiyo Dec 2013 #59
The water filtering system is still a red herring kristopher Dec 2013 #62
Close... but no cigar. FBaggins Dec 2013 #69
Another Baggins pronuclear fantasy kristopher Dec 2013 #73
Was there anything in there that was even a little on-topic? FBaggins Dec 2013 #76
Yes, it is character assassination. kristopher Dec 2013 #78
Dead wrong. FBaggins Dec 2013 #79
Then you have evidence. Produce it. kristopher Dec 2013 #81
See 82. FBaggins Dec 2013 #83
I wonder how long it would take... Blanks Dec 2013 #34
The sailors were told to stop using desalinated water because it was contaminated bananas Dec 2013 #89
That's how the sailors know they were exposed to radiation bananas Dec 2013 #11
It sounds like he ate before washing his hands. kristopher Dec 2013 #19
thanks for this link, I'm a little uneasy about sharing the turner news network with anybody.. Voice for Peace Dec 2013 #29
Some older links, if you haven't seen them. bananas Dec 2013 #31
The non-ruling class are expendable. We're pawns in the elites' games. nt valerief Dec 2013 #4
It seems like the link is broken. FarPoint Dec 2013 #7
Here's a different link bananas Dec 2013 #8
Partial transcript bananas Dec 2013 #9
It's working for me. kristopher Dec 2013 #10
The link in the OP works for me. nt bananas Dec 2013 #12
Even if the link doesn't work... Blanks Dec 2013 #22
FYI FarPoint Dec 2013 #32
Use the nuclear-news.net link bananas Dec 2013 #36
Done. FarPoint Dec 2013 #38
It's been picked up by Al Jazeera bananas Dec 2013 #61
New info from Al Jazeera - several sailors don't have their participation in their medical records bananas Dec 2013 #72
I've got it posted on my Facebook wall... FarPoint Dec 2013 #86
"it’s only been 3 years since they went in." NickB79 Dec 2013 #13
Dubious Source ninjanurse Dec 2013 #14
I think the original source is in post #8, which is not a right-wing source. bananas Dec 2013 #21
Why do soo many people here penndragon69 Dec 2013 #15
A number of nuclear energy proponents frequent this space kristopher Dec 2013 #20
Because the science doesn't seem to support it NickB79 Dec 2013 #40
Fifty-one out of 5680? jmowreader Dec 2013 #16
Believe it or not MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #18
whoever is keeping everything clean, or working on maintenance, Voice for Peace Dec 2013 #28
Yes. And they been doing it for almost 100 years now MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #33
yah, personally I would expect it to be the radiation. Voice for Peace Dec 2013 #35
Yet they missed a faulty water purification system? NickB79 Dec 2013 #41
I am sure those systems are automated MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #43
Mother Nature's Radioactivity PamW Dec 2013 #45
Ha MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #47
Take another look at the image you posted FBaggins Dec 2013 #48
I didn't say i thought or say it was anything. MyNameGoesHere Dec 2013 #49
I am very curious why you posted some "scary" looking chart instead of idwiyo Dec 2013 #51
Just to illustrate your point: idwiyo Dec 2013 #52
Is anybody here knowledgeable about the Turner Radio Network? Voice for Peace Dec 2013 #27
I am not surprised. Sad, but not surprised. nt MADem Dec 2013 #30
Manual of Naval Preventive Medicine: Chapter 6 Water Supply Afloat kristopher Dec 2013 #44
Wow. And I assume therefore that everyone in Japan has brain tumors, luekemia and... NNadir Dec 2013 #54
I suppose you have me there... kristopher Dec 2013 #55
Really? Besides being an expert on lawyered up fantasy epidemiology... NNadir Dec 2013 #57
Deploying electric vehicles is a key element in reducing carbon emissions. kristopher Dec 2013 #58
Really? Climate change is all about cars for billionaires and millionaires? NNadir Dec 2013 #85
Please delete the holocaust denying/white nationalist link in the OP and use another muriel_volestrangler Dec 2013 #50
+1. n/t Laelth Dec 2013 #53
+2 Thank you. Didn't bother to even look at this link, but after seeing your post I did. idwiyo Dec 2013 #60
The story is accurate kristopher Dec 2013 #63
Great, delete that despicable link and replace it with a legitimate source. idwiyo Dec 2013 #64
Despicable link? kristopher Dec 2013 #65
Please, do elaborate about my efforts to "misdirect readers ". Explanation about efficency of RO idwiyo Dec 2013 #66
You're right. kristopher Dec 2013 #67
Accepted :) Was just really surprised. We are all human, and I get very passionate too idwiyo Dec 2013 #68
I already have muriel_volestrangler Dec 2013 #70
Exactly some people, including me, haven't read it. kristopher Dec 2013 #74
Depends on what you're calling "the story". FBaggins Dec 2013 #71
You are in no position to make that declaration. kristopher Dec 2013 #75
Actually... I am. FBaggins Dec 2013 #77
And I spent 8 years in command and control kristopher Dec 2013 #80
I have plenty of evidence... and I pointed you at it. FBaggins Dec 2013 #82
Getting washed to remove radioactive contamination. kristopher Dec 2013 #84
Don't you think you would have more credibility... FBaggins Dec 2013 #87
100% WRONG!! AGAIN!! PamW Dec 2013 #88
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»51 Sailors from USS Ronal...»Reply #58