Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
2. That's an interesting take on the new data...
Wed Dec 18, 2013, 11:41 AM
Dec 2013

Last edited Wed Dec 18, 2013, 12:18 PM - Edit history (1)

The article:

""This work takes an entirely new direction on research into natural radioactivity in biology and raises important questions about genetic mutation," Professor Marks said."

and
"Professor Marks said the work was both exciting and unexpected, emerging as a spin-off from an Australian Research Council funded project on nuclear waste."


PamGreg:
"Yes; this has been hypothesized for some time."



The article is discussing the naturally occurring carbon14 in all living organisms.

PamGreg writes:
Are you going to somehow ban Carbon-14? Good luck with that; because Mother Nature makes OODLES of it all the time due to the solar radiation interacting with the atmosphere.


There's no need to continue any further.

The reason I posted this in EE rather than the Science forum was that I'm wondering if these findings are going to be relevant to recent research on the effectiveness of cell repair mechanisms; research, I should add, that the nuclear industry delights in misusing by claiming it as "proof" invalidating the Linear No Threshold approach to understanding the risks of damage from ionizing radiation.
Even though it isn't dealing with ionizing radiation, this statement from the researcher piqued my curiosity.
"We have discovered a subtle process that could easily be overlooked by the standard cell repair mechanisms in the body, potentially creating a new pathway for mutations to occur."


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Radioactivity muddles the...»Reply #2