Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PamW

(1,825 posts)
3. Evidently you don't understand LINEARITY!!
Wed Dec 18, 2013, 01:09 PM
Dec 2013

kristopher states
I should add, that the nuclear industry delights in misusing by claiming it as "proof" invalidating the Linear No Threshold approach to understanding the risks of damage from ionizing radiation.

The existence of a repair mechanism DOES INVALIDATE Linearity.

If you don't know that; then you don't understand what is meant by "Linearity".

The initial damage IS proportional to the radiation dose. If that were ALL that was happening, then there would be linearity.

But if there is a repair mechanism; then the additional effect of the repair mechanism DEVIATES from the initial linearity.

It's as if we have a linear equation: y = ax

If I add an exponential term to it; y = ax + exp(cx)

then BY DEFINITION I've messed up linearity.

Sorry; but the experimentally demonstrated existence of a repair mechanism CONCLUSIVELY and BY DEFINITION invalidate linearity.

PamW

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Radioactivity muddles the...»Reply #3