Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
Mon Dec 23, 2013, 11:01 AM Dec 2013

Radiation from Fukushima Will Be 10 Times Bigger than All Radiation from Nuclear Tests Combined [View all]

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/12/fukushima.html

Putting Fukushima In Perspective: There was no background radioactive cesium before above-ground nuclear testing and nuclear accidents started. Wikipedia provides some details on the distribution of cesium-137 due to human activities:

Small amounts of caesium-134 and caesium-137 were released into the environment during nearly all nuclear weapon tests and some nuclear accidents, most notably the Chernobyl disaster.

***

Caesium-137 is unique in that it is totally anthropogenic. Unlike most other radioisotopes, caesium-137 is not produced from its non-radioactive isotope, but from uranium. It did not occur in nature before nuclear weapons testing began. By observing the characteristic gamma rays emitted by this isotope, it is possible to determine whether the contents of a given sealed container were made before or after the advent of atomic bomb explosions. This procedure has been used by researchers to check the authenticity of certain rare wines, most notably the purported “Jefferson bottles”.


As the EPA notes:

Cesium-133 is the only naturally occurring isotope and is non-radioactive; all other isotopes, including cesium-137, are produced by human activity.

What people call “background” radiation is really the amount of radiation deposited into the environment within the last 100 years from nuclear tests and nuclear accidents (and naturally-occurring substances, such as radon).

2,053 nuclear tests occurred between 1945 and 1998:



Above-ground nuclear tests – which caused numerous cancers to the “downwinders” – were covered up by the American, French and other governments for decades...But the amount of radiation pumped out by Fukushima dwarfs the amount released by the nuclear tests...This graphic from Woods Hole in Massachusetts – one of the world’s top ocean science institutions – shows how much more cesium was dumped into the sea off Japan from Fukushima as compared to nuclear testing and Chernobyl:



(And Fukushima radiation has arrived on the West Coast years earlier than predicted.)

MORE
52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nope. FBaggins Dec 2013 #1
Should be required reading for everyone madokie Dec 2013 #2
He beat you to it Demeter Dec 2013 #3
Yup madokie Dec 2013 #4
Seriously? You found that "informative" FBaggins Dec 2013 #5
Whatever you say, Mr madokie Dec 2013 #6
It's not "whatever I say"... it's reality. FBaggins Dec 2013 #7
"its reality" darkangel218 Dec 2013 #22
Nope... not "as perceived by me" FBaggins Dec 2013 #26
I call BS. lol darkangel218 Dec 2013 #27
You can "call" whatever you like FBaggins Dec 2013 #32
Lulz!!! darkangel218 Dec 2013 #34
What difference does 3 miles vs. 50 miles make? NickB79 Dec 2013 #37
Huge difference. darkangel218 Dec 2013 #40
Interesting. The Chernobyl and Fukushima exclusion zones aren't as large as I thought NickB79 Dec 2013 #43
BTW, TEPCO dumped an incredible amount of irradiated water into the Pacific Ocean, darkangel218 Dec 2013 #50
The nearest nuclear power plant to me.. PamW Dec 2013 #46
STILL TRIVIAL PamW Dec 2013 #8
THERE you are! Demeter Dec 2013 #9
Lmao!!!! darkangel218 Dec 2013 #10
ooPS! Demeter Dec 2013 #12
- 1 million, Pam darkangel218 Dec 2013 #11
Whatever... PamW Dec 2013 #52
Talk about not knowing how to read... NNadir Dec 2013 #13
Welcome to the discussion! Demeter Dec 2013 #14
You and kristopher appear to be in agreement -- do you also have "a thing going on?" phantom power Dec 2013 #16
Not after he yelled at me Demeter Dec 2013 #17
I don't know if it's still running, but I think this thread needs a DUZY Demeter Dec 2013 #15
And the DUzy goes to the poster with the most Caps!!! darkangel218 Dec 2013 #18
Here's the thing about that. FBaggins Dec 2013 #19
FBaggings.. darkangel218 Dec 2013 #21
HOGWASH!!! PamW Dec 2013 #28
Pam, give it up. darkangel218 Dec 2013 #29
Seriously.. PamW Dec 2013 #35
lol.. darkangel218 Dec 2013 #36
Why get so upset over a change of font PamW Dec 2013 #39
Honey, im not only upset over the font, darkangel218 Dec 2013 #41
What's "not working" PamW Dec 2013 #44
"I really do NOT care if you learn anything." darkangel218 Dec 2013 #45
Well good! PamW Dec 2013 #47
Most of that OP is from a Woods Hole article, including the infographic kristopher Dec 2013 #23
Lol... except for... FBaggins Dec 2013 #24
So Pam is not the only one using bold heh darkangel218 Dec 2013 #25
Pam's rhetorical abuses are not that she uses bold FBaggins Dec 2013 #30
FBaggings.. darkangel218 Dec 2013 #33
WRONG Again PamW Dec 2013 #38
Bold again, Pam? darkangel218 Dec 2013 #42
Yes - bold. PamW Dec 2013 #48
"members of the target audience", eh? darkangel218 Dec 2013 #49
Which still leaves it head and shoulders above the content of ... kristopher Dec 2013 #31
See post 30 madokie Dec 2013 #51
This is a real jumble of factoids caraher Dec 2013 #20
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Radiation from Fukushima ...»Reply #0