Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

(11,689 posts)

3. Yes....like half a mile or so.

Tue Dec 13, 2011, 05:56 PM

Dec 2011

In abandoned mines. You would need a long extension cord, but it would be short in comparison with the one from Hoover Dam to Los Angeles.

If you want to read the article, it is here: http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=ebb6e116-e5fa-4dfd-8852-a7b1398bd97d%40sessionmgr115&vid=2&hid=126

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Small (nuclear) reactors could figure into U.S. energy future [View all] OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 OP

I could go along with this izquierdista Dec 2011 #1

Could you bury a reactor so deeply that it could not be dug up again? OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #2

Yes....like half a mile or so. izquierdista Dec 2011 #3

Wow Mr. Peabody. Thanks for the trip in the wayback machine OKIsItJustMe Dec 2011 #4

Two words: "Water Table" nt DCKit Dec 2011 #5

7 words izquierdista Dec 2011 #6