Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
10. I don't know if that's your position...
Tue Dec 13, 2011, 07:59 PM
Dec 2011

After all I just met you a week ago.

There is a school of thought that says, "Life always finds a way", and points to the recoveries following things like the P-Tr event and the Toba bottleneck as proof.

Since Nature is amoral and we are as much a part of nature as mollusks and dinosaurs, why should morality factor into our relationship with nature (at least the non-human bits of it)? This seems to be the default world-view of modern industrial/technological civilization. Environmentalists tend to disagree, but that objection is quite anthropomorphic, with little connection to the utilitarian nature of the processes at work in the natural world.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Nature - Acidic Seawater ...»Reply #10