Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)

5. I suppose he doesn't think it's viable. Personally, I'd have left out fusion as well.

Reply to bananas (Reply #3)

Fri Feb 10, 2012, 10:09 AM

Feb 2012

And yes, I agree that the timeline of a century makes any prognostication suspect. If he'd shortened it down to 30 years and left out fusion it would be a little easier to buy.

ETA: Somebody's ox always gets gored in exercises like this.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Alternative Energy Matrix [View all] GliderGuider Feb 2012 OP

A good at-a-glance summary FBaggins Feb 2012 #1

Tom addresses both your observations in the body of the TOD post. GliderGuider Feb 2012 #2

Addressed? Well yes, I suppose so... FBaggins Feb 2012 #4

Oh, he's already getting raked over the coals in TOD for various things like that. n/t GliderGuider Feb 2012 #6

This century? He left out space based solar power. bananas Feb 2012 #3

I suppose he doesn't think it's viable. Personally, I'd have left out fusion as well. GliderGuider Feb 2012 #5

I'd connect my backyard fission generator to the electric grid... hunter Feb 2012 #7

Agreed. The first issue that will be addressed by everybody as things tighten up is conservation. GliderGuider Feb 2012 #8