Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

txlibdem

(6,183 posts)
6. Methane is 27 times more potent greenhouse gas than is CO2
Tue Dec 13, 2011, 09:32 PM
Dec 2011

It's bubbling up in Siberia and the oceans of the Arctic.

Can we get out heads out of the sand (literally and figuratively) and start funding the long past due changeover to 100% zero carbon energy sources... ASAP. Please.

    Carter Tried To Stop Bush's Energy Disasters - 28 Years Ago
    by Thom Hartmann

    In his recent news conference, George Bush Jr. suggested that our nation's "problem" with high gasoline prices was caused by the lack of a national energy policy, and tried to blame it all on Bill Clinton. First, Junior said, "This is a problem that's been a long time in coming. We haven't had an energy policy in this country."

    This was followed by, "That's exactly what I've been saying to the American people -- 10 years ago if we'd had an energy strategy, we would be able to diversify away from foreign dependence. And -- but we haven't done that. And now we find ourselves in the fix we're in." As is so often the case, Bush was lying.

    Consider President Jimmy Carter's April 18, 1977 speech. Since it was given nearly three decades ago, when many of the reporters in Bush's White House were children, it's understandable that they don't remember it. But it's inexcusable that Bush and the mainstream media (which, after all, has the ability to do research) would completely ignore it. It was the speech that established the strategic petroleum reserve, birthed the modern solar power industry, led to the insulation of millions of American homes, and established America's first national energy policy. "With the exception of preventing war," said Jimmy Carter, a man of peace, "this is the greatest challenge our country will face during our lifetimes."

    He added: "It is a problem we will not solve in the next few years, and it is likely to get progressively worse through the rest of this century. "We must not be selfish or timid if we hope to have a decent world for our children and grandchildren.

    http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0503-22.htm

Note: this piece was written in 2005 so it would now be 34 years ago. We've lost over 30 years;we can no longer afford to "take the slow route" and now all we have left is a WWII style all-out effort to get rid of polluting energy and polluting industries.

Zero carbon energy sources are, fortunately for us, abundant and we have the technology TODAY to start. We need no more studies, no more lobbyists, we need action and we need it now, on a grand scale.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And a different perspective... Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #1
By the time they get around to discussing "negotiating legally binding restrictions"... joshcryer Dec 2011 #2
We're out of time - YOY increases in atmospheric GHG content in 2010 were 5.95% hatrack Dec 2011 #3
However, that 5.95% increase in emissions was after a decrease from 2008 to 2009 muriel_volestrangler Dec 2011 #4
The west has been relatively flat for decades, the increases are coming from India, China and the... joshcryer Dec 2011 #10
The annual increase had been slowing from 2003 to 2007 muriel_volestrangler Dec 2011 #15
2010 is the largest, though, and that's at the end of a deep recession. joshcryer Dec 2011 #17
Here, I plotted it with the 2008-2010 data: joshcryer Dec 2011 #18
Another interesting point about the subset of CO2 within the larger GHG growth picture: hatrack Dec 2011 #20
Are we out of time? Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #5
Methane is 27 times more potent greenhouse gas than is CO2 txlibdem Dec 2011 #6
It does have a much shorter atmospheric life, but it's enough to cause glacial feedbacks... joshcryer Dec 2011 #8
Point of interest: the 20-odd time worse figure is averaged over a century. Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #11
Fair point. joshcryer Dec 2011 #12
Just let me say thank you for giving me nightmares for the next month NickB79 Dec 2011 #13
Average lifetime is something like 8 years Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #16
Oops. Nihil Dec 2011 #19
Unfortunatley it'd cost $100 trillion, or roughly 10%-15% global GDP every year for a decade. joshcryer Dec 2011 #9
Have to agree. Ice free arctic in 5 years tops. Methane releases beyond expectations. joshcryer Dec 2011 #7
A post from 2006 by hatrack: joshcryer Dec 2011 #14
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Der Spiegel: The Durban C...»Reply #6