Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

madokie

(51,076 posts)

2. Pretty telling that the concentration would be that great

Reply to FBaggins (Original post)

Wed Feb 26, 2014, 05:14 PM

Feb 2014

after traveling thousands of miles through gobs of water. Begs the question of what the concentration is off shore of Fukushima

This little baby isn't over by a long shot yet so there's no telling what the long term affects will be

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Fukushima radioactivity poses little threat to California, scientists say [View all] FBaggins Feb 2014 OP

And the water in West Virginia murielm99 Feb 2014 #1

Pretty telling that the concentration would be that great madokie Feb 2014 #2

Post removed Post removed Feb 2014 #3

And when the juries don't know fuckall, it's even more of a party. Systematic Chaos Feb 2014 #4

And you are off your meds again I see madokie Feb 2014 #5

For one of us, absolutely. Systematic Chaos Feb 2014 #6

You ain't coming to get any one madokie Feb 2014 #7

Thank Dog I don't go through life as humor-impaired and uptight as you do. Systematic Chaos Feb 2014 #8

Does the same thing go for MIRT? kristopher Feb 2014 #9

You know Kris the thing is madokie Feb 2014 #10

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #11