Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

kristopher

(29,798 posts)

7. And yet you nonetheless promote nuclear whenever you have the chance.

Reply to hunter (Reply #6)

Thu Feb 27, 2014, 04:45 PM

Feb 2014

Which, of all the energy technologies, unquestionably provides the greatest incentives for increased consumerism.

That's a point that has been well made by Lovins at RMI in fact.

Your contradictions are legion.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

ECONOMIST: Ban Of High-Seas Fishing Saves $2 Per Person On The Planet [View all] xchrom Feb 2014 OP

k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Feb 2014 #1

I wish we'd stop doing things for ethical reasons, not for "economics." hunter Feb 2014 #2

That is also "economics" kristopher Feb 2014 #3

I'm very familiar with medical ethics and economics. hunter Feb 2014 #4

That makes as much sense as I'd expect ... kristopher Feb 2014 #5

Nuclear powered or solar powered an iron lung is still an iron lung. hunter Feb 2014 #6

And yet you nonetheless promote nuclear whenever you have the chance. kristopher Feb 2014 #7

? hunter Feb 2014 #8

"I'm indifferent to nuclear" kristopher Feb 2014 #9

I see no PM yet. hunter Feb 2014 #10

I judge people strictly by the posts they make. kristopher Feb 2014 #11

Skim my journal here on DU. hunter Feb 2014 #12