Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dead_Parrot

(14,478 posts)
11. Point of interest: the 20-odd time worse figure is averaged over a century.
Tue Dec 13, 2011, 10:27 PM
Dec 2011

Over shorter time periods, methane is much worse - 72xCO2 averaged over 20 years

Be afraid.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And a different perspective... Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #1
By the time they get around to discussing "negotiating legally binding restrictions"... joshcryer Dec 2011 #2
We're out of time - YOY increases in atmospheric GHG content in 2010 were 5.95% hatrack Dec 2011 #3
However, that 5.95% increase in emissions was after a decrease from 2008 to 2009 muriel_volestrangler Dec 2011 #4
The west has been relatively flat for decades, the increases are coming from India, China and the... joshcryer Dec 2011 #10
The annual increase had been slowing from 2003 to 2007 muriel_volestrangler Dec 2011 #15
2010 is the largest, though, and that's at the end of a deep recession. joshcryer Dec 2011 #17
Here, I plotted it with the 2008-2010 data: joshcryer Dec 2011 #18
Another interesting point about the subset of CO2 within the larger GHG growth picture: hatrack Dec 2011 #20
Are we out of time? Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #5
Methane is 27 times more potent greenhouse gas than is CO2 txlibdem Dec 2011 #6
It does have a much shorter atmospheric life, but it's enough to cause glacial feedbacks... joshcryer Dec 2011 #8
Point of interest: the 20-odd time worse figure is averaged over a century. Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #11
Fair point. joshcryer Dec 2011 #12
Just let me say thank you for giving me nightmares for the next month NickB79 Dec 2011 #13
Average lifetime is something like 8 years Dead_Parrot Dec 2011 #16
Oops. Nihil Dec 2011 #19
Unfortunatley it'd cost $100 trillion, or roughly 10%-15% global GDP every year for a decade. joshcryer Dec 2011 #9
Have to agree. Ice free arctic in 5 years tops. Methane releases beyond expectations. joshcryer Dec 2011 #7
A post from 2006 by hatrack: joshcryer Dec 2011 #14
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Der Spiegel: The Durban C...»Reply #11