Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eggplant

(4,202 posts)
29. Sigh.
Sat Mar 15, 2014, 11:44 AM
Mar 2014

One time radiation will sterilize food by killing (most of) the microbes in it. But the food will still rot over time when other microbes move in. In the OP, we're talking about a place where organic matter is being continually radiated, and thus rotting is inhibited.

I honestly don't know why you are arguing about this. Unless you are going to contribute to the conversation, I'm done explaining this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I say we get out there and build a shit pot more of these nuclear power plants madokie Mar 2014 #1
Seems to me that a lack of earthworms would be a factor as well Scootaloo Mar 2014 #2
Wow, I'd never heard that. I just assumed earthworms existed worldwide for eons. Arugula Latte Mar 2014 #9
Since the first settlers brought European plants, I assume NickB79 Mar 2014 #20
That might be why some Native Americans staged controlled burns LiberalEsto Mar 2014 #12
Pretty much, yeah Scootaloo Mar 2014 #21
Very interesting. longship Mar 2014 #3
Well, deliberate irradadiation has been used to keep food from spoiling GliderGuider Mar 2014 #4
This is a false comparison. eggplant Mar 2014 #5
In what way is it a "false" comparison? MNBrewer Mar 2014 #10
Because particle radiation and wave radiation are different beasts. eggplant Mar 2014 #14
What about beta particles? GliderGuider Mar 2014 #16
Ok. So how are the effects on microbes different? MNBrewer Mar 2014 #17
The effect is the same. The cause and duration of the effect is quite different. eggplant Mar 2014 #18
So the effect is the same, therefore is not a false comparison. MNBrewer Mar 2014 #24
Sigh. eggplant Mar 2014 #29
You said it was a false comparison, and you are wrong MNBrewer Mar 2014 #30
To the ignore pile with you. eggplant Mar 2014 #33
The end of the article mentions their next destination: riqster Mar 2014 #6
That makes perfect sense. nt GliderGuider Mar 2014 #7
The more I read, the more I think all the boron they dumped on the burning reactor plays a big part. hunter Mar 2014 #25
Interesting point. I didn't know about boron and decomposition. GliderGuider Mar 2014 #26
Good grief. bananas Mar 2014 #27
How does this relate to what I wrote? hunter Mar 2014 #31
It is a very informative read NickB79 Mar 2014 #34
That is eerie and terrifying. Arugula Latte Mar 2014 #8
Shouldn't This Also Be The Case DallasNE Mar 2014 #11
I think they carted all the soil away. Demeter Mar 2014 #13
some interesting stuff about test sites. littlewolf Mar 2014 #15
Nevada Test site is a fascinating explore on Google Maps satellite view. hunter Mar 2014 #19
On the other hand, Bikini Atoll was bombed 23 times NickB79 Mar 2014 #22
Could as well be all the crap they dumped on the reactor trying to put the fire out... hunter Mar 2014 #23
Your first guess is wrong. bananas Mar 2014 #28
See my post above. hunter Mar 2014 #32
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Interesting! Survey Work...»Reply #29