Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NickB79

(20,386 posts)
3. 1.5% annually for 24 years,despite all the renewables we've installed
Sun May 4, 2014, 10:41 PM
May 2014

It means that all the renewables we've added to this point only worked to take the edge off our emissions.

If we want any chance at all of preventing a global catastrophe in our lifetimes, simply holding increases to 1.5% annually is pathetically insufficient.

As the article stated:

Reversing the continuing trend — the last decade has seen steady increases of 1.4 to 1.5 percent — won't be easy. The Kyoto Protocol, which the United States has declined to ratify, set as a goal reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels.


We're already so far beyond any semblance of a safe CO2 level in the atmosphere that we basically have to not only stop virtually all CO2 emissions in the next 15 years, but find ways to actively sequester CO2 as well. All the while supporting a global economy of 8-9 billion people.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

bad phantom power May 2014 #1
Not as bad as it used to be Benton D Struckcheon May 2014 #2
1.5% annually for 24 years,despite all the renewables we've installed NickB79 May 2014 #3
It's both worse and better Benton D Struckcheon May 2014 #4
One other point to consider: GliderGuider May 2014 #5
For the US and Europe, at least, that last part is not true. Benton D Struckcheon May 2014 #6
US and EU are not the world. GliderGuider May 2014 #7
Obviously, it has to change in the advanced part of the world first. Benton D Struckcheon May 2014 #8
We'll see. nt GliderGuider May 2014 #9
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»NOAA - Net Heating Effect...»Reply #3