Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Benton D Struckcheon

(2,347 posts)
6. For the US and Europe, at least, that last part is not true.
Mon May 5, 2014, 09:21 AM
May 2014

What is true is that as the economy recovers, people use their cars more, so total energy usage is increasing. But for the sector that the IPCC correctly focuses on for the fact it's both easier and you get more bang because you can retire the coal plants - electricity - renewables haven't lead to an increase in electric usage. Electricity usage has been gently declining, actually, because of increased efficiency in household appliances combined with better insulated houses. So there you have a double effect: the share of renewables has been increasing at the same time as total electric power generated has actually declined some. This too is probably why ALEC is getting involved all of a sudden.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

bad phantom power May 2014 #1
Not as bad as it used to be Benton D Struckcheon May 2014 #2
1.5% annually for 24 years,despite all the renewables we've installed NickB79 May 2014 #3
It's both worse and better Benton D Struckcheon May 2014 #4
One other point to consider: GliderGuider May 2014 #5
For the US and Europe, at least, that last part is not true. Benton D Struckcheon May 2014 #6
US and EU are not the world. GliderGuider May 2014 #7
Obviously, it has to change in the advanced part of the world first. Benton D Struckcheon May 2014 #8
We'll see. nt GliderGuider May 2014 #9
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»NOAA - Net Heating Effect...»Reply #6