Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
1. Before the nay-sayers post, I want to emphasize
Mon Jun 16, 2014, 08:06 AM
Jun 2014

Harvey Wasserman is a JOURNALIST. He is not a nuclear scientist.

He doesn't measure the data, analyze the data, massage the data....

HE JUST REPORTS THE FACTS.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Fukushima's Children are Dying [View all] unhappycamper Jun 2014 OP
Before the nay-sayers post, I want to emphasize Demeter Jun 2014 #1
He's no journalist when it comes to anything nuclear FBaggins Jun 2014 #3
So are you saying this is made up? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #6
Yes... he made it up entirely FBaggins Jun 2014 #7
Here's some actual reporting for comparison FBaggins Jun 2014 #9
That's really interesting. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #11
Nobody can say for certain... FBaggins Jun 2014 #15
Half of almost any group having what I would think of as medical Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #17
True... but you have to ask yourself... FBaggins Jun 2014 #18
Especially when this is the SECOND time Japan has suffered massive irradiation, you mean? Demeter Jun 2014 #20
Lol... nice try. Let's play a game. FBaggins Jun 2014 #22
From the website: Children of the Atomic Bomb Demeter Jun 2014 #23
So...um... that's 6-0 in my favor, eh? FBaggins Jun 2014 #24
BUT--the Fukushima disaster is the gift that keeps on giving Demeter Jun 2014 #25
Sorry... you don't get to play games with reality. FBaggins Jun 2014 #27
Have a nice, big dose of reality, with your radiation, Baggins Demeter Jun 2014 #28
Lol... was that an oddly-worded apology? Or did you not even read what you posted? FBaggins Jun 2014 #29
You can't prove a negative Demeter Jun 2014 #30
Sorry... you've confused your logical fallacies. FBaggins Jun 2014 #31
You are a nuclear apologist, and there's far too much to apologize for Demeter Jun 2014 #32
How predictable FBaggins Jun 2014 #37
For three years Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #2
In order for the talking point to go away... FBaggins Jun 2014 #4
'Dose' also has a time component. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #5
That's incorrect FBaggins Jun 2014 #8
You've got it exactly backwards. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #10
Nope. FBaggins Jun 2014 #12
Ah, ok Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #14
No problem at all FBaggins Jun 2014 #16
Actually looking at what you said, I think we Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #13
I don't see any info that a child has actually died from Fukishima. OnlinePoker Jun 2014 #19
Cancer takes a while. Check back in ten years. Demeter Jun 2014 #21
Nothing to see here...move along. deathrind Jun 2014 #26
This is horrible that so many children are dying. We must get rid of nuclear power plants for good. WilliamTuckness Jun 2014 #33
Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #34
Fukushima: Another Disaster The Nuclear/Radiation Cartel Lies About Wo49 Jun 2014 #35
You're going to use your very first post to shill for the lunatic fringe? FBaggins Jun 2014 #36
Welcome to D.U., Wo49. We are clearly deeply disrespected by the corporate "news" media. n/t Judi Lynn Jun 2014 #38
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Fukushima's Children are ...»Reply #1