Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
23. From the website: Children of the Atomic Bomb
Mon Jun 16, 2014, 01:30 PM
Jun 2014

"A UCLA Physician's Eyewitness Report and Call to Save the World's Children"

http://www.aasc.ucla.edu/cab/200708230011.html



The left half of the photograph shows a boy who was one year old at the time of exposure, resulting in a severe form of hypothyroid/cretinism. The right half of the photograph shows the same child three years later following treatment with thyroid hormone.




Radioactive iodine in the fallout is internally absorbed by inhalation and injures the thyroid. The developing thyroid of infants and young children is very vulnerable. Nearly all of the children under ten years of age developed injuries to the thyroid.


FROM ANOTHER SECTION OF THE WEBSITE:



One of the initial Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission studies conducted at Nagasaki in 1950 was the outcome of the pregnancy in mothers exposed to the radiation from the atomic bomb. Note the abnormally shaped small head—microcephaly—accompanied by mental retardation.
Microcephaly due to in-utero exposure (seven week gestation in estimate). Exposure distance of 1.2km from Nagasaki hypocenter. Delayed grown in whole body and microcephaly observed (right). Fifteen years and eight months old. Died March 1962. Twelve year old normal child (left).


Outcome of pregnancies of mothers who were within 2,000 metres of the hypocenter was finally initiated and concluded just prior to my return to the U.S. In mothers who demonstrated signs of radiation sickness compared to mothers who did not develop such findings there was a significant increase in perinatal loss and some of their children had an abnormally shaped small head who were mentally retarded. The incidence of miscarriage, stillbirth and death during infancy was 43 percent, seven times the incidence in a control group who were considered to have received no radiation. In an interdisciplinary laboratory investigation initiated at UCLA following my return, the effect of radiation alone revealed the marked vulnerability of the developing brain. The brain lesions and neurological abnormalities were greater in the younger animals and the severity was a function of the radiation dose.

THESE ARE PEOPLE'S LIVES AND SUFFERING YOU DISMISS WITH A WAVE OF YOUR TOTALLY NON-CREDENTIALED HAND.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Fukushima's Children are Dying [View all] unhappycamper Jun 2014 OP
Before the nay-sayers post, I want to emphasize Demeter Jun 2014 #1
He's no journalist when it comes to anything nuclear FBaggins Jun 2014 #3
So are you saying this is made up? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #6
Yes... he made it up entirely FBaggins Jun 2014 #7
Here's some actual reporting for comparison FBaggins Jun 2014 #9
That's really interesting. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #11
Nobody can say for certain... FBaggins Jun 2014 #15
Half of almost any group having what I would think of as medical Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #17
True... but you have to ask yourself... FBaggins Jun 2014 #18
Especially when this is the SECOND time Japan has suffered massive irradiation, you mean? Demeter Jun 2014 #20
Lol... nice try. Let's play a game. FBaggins Jun 2014 #22
From the website: Children of the Atomic Bomb Demeter Jun 2014 #23
So...um... that's 6-0 in my favor, eh? FBaggins Jun 2014 #24
BUT--the Fukushima disaster is the gift that keeps on giving Demeter Jun 2014 #25
Sorry... you don't get to play games with reality. FBaggins Jun 2014 #27
Have a nice, big dose of reality, with your radiation, Baggins Demeter Jun 2014 #28
Lol... was that an oddly-worded apology? Or did you not even read what you posted? FBaggins Jun 2014 #29
You can't prove a negative Demeter Jun 2014 #30
Sorry... you've confused your logical fallacies. FBaggins Jun 2014 #31
You are a nuclear apologist, and there's far too much to apologize for Demeter Jun 2014 #32
How predictable FBaggins Jun 2014 #37
For three years Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #2
In order for the talking point to go away... FBaggins Jun 2014 #4
'Dose' also has a time component. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #5
That's incorrect FBaggins Jun 2014 #8
You've got it exactly backwards. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #10
Nope. FBaggins Jun 2014 #12
Ah, ok Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #14
No problem at all FBaggins Jun 2014 #16
Actually looking at what you said, I think we Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #13
I don't see any info that a child has actually died from Fukishima. OnlinePoker Jun 2014 #19
Cancer takes a while. Check back in ten years. Demeter Jun 2014 #21
Nothing to see here...move along. deathrind Jun 2014 #26
This is horrible that so many children are dying. We must get rid of nuclear power plants for good. WilliamTuckness Jun 2014 #33
Post removed Post removed Jun 2014 #34
Fukushima: Another Disaster The Nuclear/Radiation Cartel Lies About Wo49 Jun 2014 #35
You're going to use your very first post to shill for the lunatic fringe? FBaggins Jun 2014 #36
Welcome to D.U., Wo49. We are clearly deeply disrespected by the corporate "news" media. n/t Judi Lynn Jun 2014 #38
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Fukushima's Children are ...»Reply #23